Paper · 2026 · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health

Eco(geno)toxicological effects of the dye Direct Red 09 on plants and soil invertebrates: a preliminary terrestrial risk assessment based on species sensitivity distributions

Leonardo Mendes da Silva; Vanessa de Souza Vieira Dutra; Ana Letícia Borgo; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the eco(geno)toxicological effects of the widely used textile dye Direct Red 09 on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure and integrating the newly obtained results with previously published data. Bioassays with Cenchrus americanus, Allium cepa, Panagrellus redivivus, and Enchytraeus crypticus were conducted at concentrations ranging from 0.437 to 14 g/L, assessing germination, seedling growth, mitotic index, micronucleus frequency, and organism immobilization. The dye markedly induced cytogenotoxicity in A. cepa, moderate phytotoxicity in C. americanus, higher sensitivity in P. redivivus, and limited effects on E. crypticus. By integrating these findings with previous data for Lactuca sativa, a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) was established, noting the following the sensitivity gradient A. cepa > L. sativa > C. americanus > P. redivivus > E. crypticus. The hazardous concentration for 5% of species (HC5) was determined to be 1.79 g/L Direct Red 09 textile dye and the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was 0.089 g/L. The relatively high HC5 indicated a low potential for acute ecological risk under typical exposure conditions. However, the cytogenotoxic responses observed in sensitive species indicate that potential chronic effects need to be considered, reinforcing the necessity for environmentally realistic and long-term studies to refine protective thresholds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dye markedly induced cytogenotoxicity in Allium cepa.

Taxon
A. cepaAllium cepae1
Treatment
dyee1
Outcome
cytogenotoxicitye1
Direction
inducede1
Qualifier
markedlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The dye markedly induced cytogenotoxicity in A. cepa, moderate phytotoxicity in C. americanus, higher sensitivity in P. redivivus, and limited effects on E. crypticus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dye caused moderate phytotoxicity in Cenchrus americanus.

Taxon
C. americanusCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
dyee1
Outcome
phytotoxicitye1
Qualifier
moderatee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The dye markedly induced cytogenotoxicity in A. cepa, moderate phytotoxicity in C. americanus, higher sensitivity in P. redivivus, and limited effects on E. crypticus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–687 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panagrellus redivivus showed higher sensitivity to the dye.

Taxon
terrestrial speciese5
Outcome
sensitivity in P. redivivuse1
Direction
highere1

Verbatim

e5

“on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“The dye markedly induced cytogenotoxicity in A. cepa, moderate phytotoxicity in C. americanus, higher sensitivity in P. redivivus, and limited effects on E. crypticus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–687 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dye had limited effects on Enchytraeus crypticus.

Taxon
terrestrial speciese5
Outcome
effects on E. crypticuse1
Qualifier
limitede1

Verbatim

e5

“on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“The dye markedly induced cytogenotoxicity in A. cepa, moderate phytotoxicity in C. americanus, higher sensitivity in P. redivivus, and limited effects on E. crypticus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–687 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A species sensitivity distribution ranks sensitivity as A. cepa > L. sativa > C. americanus > P. redivivus > E. crypticus.

Taxon
terrestrial speciese5
Outcome
sensitivity gradiente2
Comparator
previous data for Lactuca sativae2

Verbatim

e5

“on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“By integrating these findings with previous data for Lactuca sativa, a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) was established, noting the following the sensitivity gradient A. cepa > L. sativa > C. americanus > P. redivivus > E. crypticus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–927 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The hazardous concentration for 5% of species (HC5) is 1.79 g/L of the dye.

Taxon
terrestrial speciese5
Outcome
hazardous concentration for 5% of species (HC5)e3
Value
1.79 g/Le3

Verbatim

e5

“on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–176 · show in text ↑
e3

“The hazardous concentration for 5% of species (HC5) was determined to be 1.79 g/L Direct Red 09 textile dye and the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was 0.089 g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1099 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) is 0.089 g/L of the dye.

Taxon
terrestrial speciese5
Outcome
predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC)e3
Value
0.089 g/Le3

Verbatim

e5

“on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–176 · show in text ↑
e3

“The hazardous concentration for 5% of species (HC5) was determined to be 1.79 g/L Direct Red 09 textile dye and the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was 0.089 g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The dye poses a low potential for acute ecological risk under typical exposure conditions.

Taxon
terrestrial speciese5
Outcome
potential for acute ecological riske4
Qualifier
under typical exposure conditionse4

Verbatim

e5

“on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–176 · show in text ↑
e4

“The relatively high HC5 indicated a low potential for acute ecological risk under typical exposure conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1210 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Environmentally realistic and long-term studies are needed to refine protective thresholds for this dye.

Taxon
terrestrial speciese5
Outcome
environmentally realistic and long-term studiese6

Verbatim

e5

“on multiple terrestrial species as bioindicator models of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–176 · show in text ↑
e6

“reinforcing the necessity for environmentally realistic and long-term studies to refine protective thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1451 · show in text ↑