Paper · 2026 · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)

Biological effectiveness of using fungicides and IFO PZN suspension in combination with fungicides against yellow rust and powdery mildew diseases of winter wheat

G’olibjon Musayev; Doniyor Oripov; Akmal Meyliyev; et al.

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In this study, effective protection methods were applied against fungal diseases commonly found in soft winter-sown wheat grown in the foothill regions of the Kashkadarya region, using fungicides and suspensions. The research identified the impact of these treatments on plant health and the progression of disease development. During the 2019–2020 growing season, in untreated control plots, the average number of wheat plants per 1 m² was 410, with the initial incidence of yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis) affecting 230 plants (infection rate: 56.1%). During the disease’s peak and decline phases, infection rates increased to 73.41% and 76.1%, respectively, with 301 and 312 infected plants. Between 2020 and 2022, disease severity increased significantly. For instance, during the epidemic stage of 2020–2022 and 2021–2022, infection levels rose by 2.43% to 5.72% compared to 2019–2020, and by 1.65% to 4.24% in the final stage, with yields reduced by 1.5 to 3.2 c/ha. In field trials, the biological effectiveness of combining fungicides (Duazol 40% EC at 0.25 l/ha (reference), Bi- Kanazol 400 g/l at 0.3 l/ha, AZOTE 320 SC 32% SC at 0.3 l/ha, Rauma 490 EC at 1.25 l/ha, Alta Super 40% at 0.3 l/ha, Altus Duo 32.5% at 0.3 l/ha) with IFO PZN suspension (3.0 l/ha) was tested against yellow rust and powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis). Results showed that disease incidence in untreated control plots ranged from 74.2% to 54.4%, while combining AZOTE 320 SC and Rauma 490 EC with IFO PZN reduced disease levels to 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively. Biological effectiveness reached 98.6– 99.1% against yellow rust and 99.0% against powdery mildew. Thus, using a combination of IFO PZN suspension with AZOTE 320 SC or Rauma 490 EC fungicides is recommended for chemical control of these diseases in winter wheat. The combined application enhances chlorophyll content and improves biochemical composition in plant tissues, increasing resistance to both diseases and environmental stress. These methods contribute to high- quality yields and effective disease prevention in wheat production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence in untreated control plots ranged from 74.2% to 54.4%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
disease incidence in untreated control plotse1
Direction
ranged frome1
Value
74.2% to 54.4%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“disease incidence in untreated control plots ranged from 74.2% to 54.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial yellow rust incidence affected 230 plants, a 56.1% infection rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Puccinia striiformisPuccinia striiformise3pathogen
Outcome
initial incidencee3
Direction
affectinge3
Value
56.1%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia striiformis
Puccinia striiformis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the initial incidence of yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis) affecting 230 plants (infection rate: 56.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection rates increased to 73.41% at the disease peak.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
infection ratese4
Direction
increasede4
Value
73.41%e4
Qualifier
peake4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“During the disease’s peak and decline phases, infection rates increased to 73.41% and 76.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection rates increased to 76.1% in the decline phase of the disease.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
infection ratese4
Direction
increasede4
Value
76.1%e4
Qualifier
decline phasese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“During the disease’s peak and decline phases, infection rates increased to 73.41% and 76.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection levels rose by 2.43% to 5.72% in the 2020–2022 epidemic stage compared with 2019–2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
infection levelse5
Direction
rosee5
Value
2.43% to 5.72%e5
Comparator
2019–2020e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“infection levels rose by 2.43% to 5.72% compared to 2019–2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection levels rose by 1.65% to 4.24% in the final stage compared with 2019–2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
infection levelse6
Direction
rosee6
Value
1.65% to 4.24%e6
Qualifier
in the final stagee6
Comparator
2019–2020e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“infection levels rose by 2.43% to 5.72% compared to 2019–2020, and by 1.65% to 4.24% in the final stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields were reduced by 1.5 to 3.2 c/ha as disease severity increased.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
reducede7
Value
1.5 to 3.2 c/hae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“with yields reduced by 1.5 to 3.2 c/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity increased significantly between 2020 and 2022.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Between 2020 and 2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between 2020 and 2022, disease severity increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining fungicides with IFO PZN suspension reached 98.6–99.1% biological effectiveness against yellow rust.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
IFO PZN suspension (3.0 l/ha)e2
Interactor
yellow ruste1pathogen
Outcome
Biological effectivenesse1
Direction
reachede1
Value
98.6– 99.1%e1
Comparator
untreated control plotse3
Setting
field trialse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Biological effectiveness reached 98.6– 99.1% against yellow rust and 99.0% against powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1647 · show in text ↑
e2

“In field trials, the biological effectiveness of combining fungicides (Duazol 40% EC at 0.25 l/ha (reference), Bi- Kanazol 400 g/l at 0.3 l/ha, AZOTE 320 SC 32% SC at 0.3 l/ha, Rauma 490 EC at 1.25 l/ha, Alta Super 40% at 0.3 l/ha, Altus Duo 32.5% at 0.3 l/ha) with IFO PZN suspension (3.0 l/ha) was tested against yellow rust and powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1341 · show in text ↑
e3

“disease incidence in untreated control plots ranged from 74.2% to 54.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining fungicides with IFO PZN suspension reached 99.0% biological effectiveness against powdery mildew.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
IFO PZN suspension (3.0 l/ha)e2
Interactor
powdery mildewe1pathogen
Outcome
Biological effectivenesse1
Direction
reachede1
Value
99.0%e1
Comparator
untreated control plotse3
Setting
field trialse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Biological effectiveness reached 98.6– 99.1% against yellow rust and 99.0% against powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1647 · show in text ↑
e2

“In field trials, the biological effectiveness of combining fungicides (Duazol 40% EC at 0.25 l/ha (reference), Bi- Kanazol 400 g/l at 0.3 l/ha, AZOTE 320 SC 32% SC at 0.3 l/ha, Rauma 490 EC at 1.25 l/ha, Alta Super 40% at 0.3 l/ha, Altus Duo 32.5% at 0.3 l/ha) with IFO PZN suspension (3.0 l/ha) was tested against yellow rust and powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1341 · show in text ↑
e3

“disease incidence in untreated control plots ranged from 74.2% to 54.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining AZOTE 320 SC with IFO PZN reduced disease levels to 0.8% compared with untreated control plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combining AZOTE 320 SC and Rauma 490 EC with IFO PZNe2
Outcome
disease levelse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
0.8%e2
Qualifier
AZOTE 320 SCe2
Comparator
untreated control plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“disease incidence in untreated control plots ranged from 74.2% to 54.4%, while combining AZOTE 320 SC and Rauma 490 EC with IFO PZN reduced disease levels to 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining Rauma 490 EC with IFO PZN reduced disease levels to 0.5% compared with untreated control plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combining AZOTE 320 SC and Rauma 490 EC with IFO PZNe2
Outcome
disease levelse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
0.5%e2
Qualifier
Rauma 490 ECe2
Comparator
untreated control plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“disease incidence in untreated control plots ranged from 74.2% to 54.4%, while combining AZOTE 320 SC and Rauma 490 EC with IFO PZN reduced disease levels to 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A combination of IFO PZN suspension with AZOTE 320 SC or Rauma 490 EC fungicides is recommended for chemical control of these diseases in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
combination of IFO PZN suspension with AZOTE 320 SC or Rauma 490 EC fungicidese1
Outcome
chemical control of these diseasese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“using a combination of IFO PZN suspension with AZOTE 320 SC or Rauma 490 EC fungicides is recommended for chemical control of these diseases in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application enhances chlorophyll content in winter wheat tissues.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined applicatione1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
enhancese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The combined application enhances chlorophyll content and improves biochemical composition in plant tissues, increasing resistance to both diseases and environmental stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1985 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application improves the biochemical composition of winter wheat tissues.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined applicatione1
Outcome
biochemical compositione1
Direction
improvese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The combined application enhances chlorophyll content and improves biochemical composition in plant tissues, increasing resistance to both diseases and environmental stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1985 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application increases resistance of winter wheat to both diseases and environmental stress.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined applicatione1
Outcome
resistance to both diseases and environmental stresse1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The combined application enhances chlorophyll content and improves biochemical composition in plant tissues, increasing resistance to both diseases and environmental stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1985 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–162 · show in text ↑