Paper · 2026 · Trees Forests and People

Mixed plantations of Alnus formosana and Pinus massoniana improve ecosystem multifunctionality than monoculture plantations

Luocan Zhou; Linjuan Huang; Jingzhong Shi; et al.

13
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Long-term management of Pinus massoniana monoculture faces significant challenges, including low productivity, nutrient depletion, and weakened ecological functions. Alnus formosana , a native nitrogen-fixing species in southern China, can increase soil fertility and accelerates nutrient cycling. However, the impact of its mixed cultivation with P. massoniana on ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF) remains unclear. This study assessed tree growth, soil characteristics, enzyme activity, and EMF in monocultures and mixed forests at 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1 ratios (APP, AP, and AAP). Results showed that mixed-species treatment significantly increased tree growth index (TGI) of A. formosana but decreased that of P. massoniana ( P <0.05) . In mixed forests, A. formosana had higher diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (TH), crown width (CW), clear bole height (CBH) and tree volume (V) than P. massoniana , and exhibited stronger competitive effects (Slope-A=1.12∼1.27) on DBH and CW compared to P. massoniana (Slope-P=0.65∼0.96). Soil quality index (SQI) and EMF significantly increased in mixed forests than in monocultures, as evidenced by higher soil C- and N-acquisition enzyme activities and related nutrients. In mixed forests, TGI was positively correlated with SQI of A. formosana but negatively correlated with that of P. massoniana , which led to the growth of A. formosana being more sensitive to available nutrients (nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, and ammonium nitrogen), while the growth of P. massoniana was more reliant on soil total nutrients (total nitrogen and total phosphorus). Notably, A. formosana exhibited the highest TGI, SQI, and EMF in the AAP treatment. Thus, the 2:1 (AAP) mixing ratio is recommended for the scientific management of P. massoniana and A. formosana mixed forests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed-species planting significantly increased the tree growth index of Alnus formosana.

Taxon
A. formosanaAlnus formosanae0
Treatment
mixed-species treatmente0
Outcome
tree growth index (TGI)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed-species treatment significantly increased tree growth index (TGI) of A. formosana but decreased that of P. massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed-species planting decreased the tree growth index of Pinus massoniana.

Taxon
P. massonianaPinus massonianae0
Treatment
mixed-species treatmente0
Outcome
tree growth index (TGI)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed-species treatment significantly increased tree growth index (TGI) of A. formosana but decreased that of P. massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In mixed forests A. formosana had higher diameter at breast height, tree height and crown width than P. massoniana.

Taxon
A. formosanaAlnus formosanae0
Outcome
diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (TH), crown width (CW)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
P. massonianae0
Setting
mixed forestse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mixed forests, A. formosana had higher diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (TH), crown width (CW), clear bole height (CBH) and tree volume (V) than P. massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In mixed forests A. formosana had higher clear bole height and tree volume than P. massoniana.

Taxon
A. formosanaAlnus formosanae0
Outcome
clear bole height (CBH) and tree volume (V)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
P. massonianae0
Setting
mixed forestse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mixed forests, A. formosana had higher diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (TH), crown width (CW), clear bole height (CBH) and tree volume (V) than P. massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. formosana exerted stronger competitive effects on DBH and CW (slope 1.12 to 1.27) than P. massoniana (slope 0.65 to 0.96).

Taxon
A. formosanaAlnus formosanae0
Outcome
competitive effectse1
Direction
strongere1
Value
Slope-A=1.12∼1.27e1
Qualifier
Slope-P=0.65∼0.96e1
Comparator
P. massonianae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. formosana had higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“exhibited stronger competitive effects (Slope-A=1.12∼1.27) on DBH and CW compared to P. massoniana (Slope-P=0.65∼0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality index and ecosystem multifunctionality were significantly higher in mixed forests than in monocultures.

Taxon
Alnus formosana and Pinus massonianaPinus massonianaAlnus formosanat0
Treatment
mixed forestse0
Outcome
Soil quality index (SQI) and EMFe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alnus formosana and Pinus massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil quality index (SQI) and EMF significantly increased in mixed forests than in monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed forests had higher soil C- and N-acquisition enzyme activities and related nutrients.

Taxon
Alnus formosana and Pinus massonianaPinus massonianaAlnus formosanat0
Outcome
soil C- and N-acquisition enzyme activitiese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alnus formosana and Pinus massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher soil C- and N-acquisition enzyme activities and related nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1220 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In mixed forests, the tree growth index was positively correlated with the soil quality index of A. formosana.

Taxon
A. formosanaAlnus formosanae0
Outcome
TGIe0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Qualifier
SQIe0
Setting
mixed forestse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mixed forests, TGI was positively correlated with SQI of A. formosana but negatively correlated with that of P. massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1347 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In mixed forests, the tree growth index was negatively correlated with the soil quality index of P. massoniana.

Taxon
P. massonianaPinus massonianae0
Outcome
TGIe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Qualifier
SQIe0
Setting
mixed forestse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mixed forests, TGI was positively correlated with SQI of A. formosana but negatively correlated with that of P. massoniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1347 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth of A. formosana was more sensitive to available nutrients (nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen).

Taxon
A. formosanaAlnus formosanae0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
more sensitive to available nutrients (nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, and ammonium nitrogen)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of A. formosana being more sensitive to available nutrients (nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, and ammonium nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth of P. massoniana relied more on soil total nutrients (total nitrogen and total phosphorus).

Taxon
P. massonianaPinus massonianae0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
more reliant on soil total nutrients (total nitrogen and total phosphorus)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of P. massoniana was more reliant on soil total nutrients (total nitrogen and total phosphorus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1611 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. formosana had the highest tree growth index, soil quality index and ecosystem multifunctionality in the AAP (2:1) treatment.

Taxon
A. formosanaAlnus formosanae0
Treatment
AAP treatmente0
Outcome
TGI, SQI, and EMFe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. formosana exhibited the highest TGI, SQI, and EMF in the AAP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1695 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A 2:1 (AAP) mixing ratio is recommended for managing P. massoniana and A. formosana mixed forests.

Taxon
P. massoniana and A. formosanaPinus massonianaAlnus formosanae0
Outcome
2:1 (AAP) mixing ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alnus formosana
Alnus formosana · Taxon鄧信彥 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 2:1 (AAP) mixing ratio is recommended for the scientific management of P. massoniana and A. formosana mixed forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1822 · show in text ↑