Paper · 2026 · Plant Health Progress

Mitigating sorghum stalk rot yield loss through foliar and at-planting fungicide applications

Leticia Camara Vieira; Craig Dinkel; Jay Wisbey; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sorghum stalk rot is a worldwide threat to sorghum production. Current management is limited to pre-planting strategies such as hybrid selection and low planting populations. Experiments were conducted at one location in 2023 and three locations in 2024 in Kansas. Treatments included: At-planting, Xyway™ LFR® was applied as a banded dribbled 5.08 cm off-center bellow the row (2x2), a dribbled over the row (0x0), or a dribbled 5.08 cm off the row (0x2) placement. At flowering, Topguard® EQ and Adastrio™ were applied as foliar sprays. A combination treatment of Xyway™ LFR® at planting 2x2, followed by Topguard EQ at flowering was included. Panicle size, lodging, and yield were evaluated. Stalk rot incidence and severity were assessed prior to harvest. Fungicide had no significant effect on protein content, panicle size, disease severity, or disease incidence. Both hybrid type and fungicide application significantly affected grain yield. Overall, applying Xyway™ LFR® at planting 0x0, and using Topguard® EQ and Adastrio™ at the start of flowering, increased yield by 465.98, 484.53, and 505.00 kg ha⁻¹, respectively, compared to the control (p = 0.0003). Foliar application of fungicide at flowering resulted in a greater yield than either at planting application alone or combined at planting and foliar application. These findings indicate that foliar applications at the flowering are the most consistent for maximizing sorghum yield. However, fungicide use did not significantly reduce stalk rot disease in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application had no significant effect on sorghum protein content or panicle size.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Fungicidee1
Outcome
protein content, panicle sizee1
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fungicide had no significant effect on protein content, panicle size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application had no significant effect on stalk rot disease severity or disease incidence in sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Fungicidee1
Outcome
disease severity, or disease incidencee1
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fungicide had no significant effect on protein content, panicle size, disease severity, or disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application significantly affected sorghum grain yield, with no direction stated.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
fungicide applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both hybrid type and fungicide application significantly affected grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–947 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid type significantly affected sorghum grain yield, with no direction stated.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
hybrid typee1
Outcome
grain yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both hybrid type and fungicide application significantly affected grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Xyway LFR at planting in the 0x0 placement increased sorghum yield by 465.98 kg ha-1 compared with the control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Xyway™ LFR® at planting 0x0e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
465.98e1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying Xyway™ LFR® at planting 0x0, and using Topguard® EQ and Adastrio™ at the start of flowering, increased yield by 465.98, 484.53, and 505.00 kg ha⁻¹, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Topguard EQ at the start of flowering increased sorghum yield by 484.53 kg ha-1 compared with the control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Topguard® EQe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
484.53e1
Qualifier
at the start of floweringe1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying Xyway™ LFR® at planting 0x0, and using Topguard® EQ and Adastrio™ at the start of flowering, increased yield by 465.98, 484.53, and 505.00 kg ha⁻¹, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Adastrio at the start of flowering increased sorghum yield by 505.00 kg ha-1 compared with the control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Adastrio™e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
505.00 kg ha⁻¹e1
Qualifier
at the start of floweringe1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying Xyway™ LFR® at planting 0x0, and using Topguard® EQ and Adastrio™ at the start of flowering, increased yield by 465.98, 484.53, and 505.00 kg ha⁻¹, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicide application at flowering gave a greater sorghum yield than at-planting application alone or combined at-planting and foliar application.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Foliar application of fungicide at floweringe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
at planting application alone or combined at planting and foliar applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar application of fungicide at flowering resulted in a greater yield than either at planting application alone or combined at planting and foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1328 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that foliar applications at flowering are the most consistent way to maximize sorghum yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
foliar applications at the floweringe1
Outcome
maximizing sorghum yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These findings indicate that foliar applications at the flowering are the most consistent for maximizing sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1448 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

stage · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.