Paper · 2026 · Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Antiplasmodial and antioxidant constituents from the stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f. (Anacardiaceae): isolation and bioactivity evaluation

Dé Ndonaï-Koula Lafya Bodeboret Djimtoingar; Jean Noël Nyemb; Hervé Landry Ketsemen; et al.

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f. (Anacardiaceae) is widely used in African traditional medicine for the management of malaria and other ailments. However, its active antiplasmodial constituents remain insufficiently characterized. To evaluate the antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities of the stem bark extract of H. barteri , identify its major bioactive constituents, and explore their potential interactions with falcipain-2 through exploratory docking studies in order to better understand compounds that may contribute to its traditional medicinal use. A hydroethanolic stem bark extract was evaluated for in vitro antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 (multidrug-resistant) and 3D7 (chloroquine-sensitive) strains. The extract was fractionated by column chromatography into four fractions (A–D), which were similarly tested. Further chromatographic purification of fractions A, B, and C yielded six known compounds: 3- O -methylellagic acid-4′- O - α -rhamnopyranoside ( 1 ), stigmast-4-en-3,6-dione ( 2 ), stigmast-3,6-dione ( 3 ), β -sitosterol ( 4 ), 6-hydroxystigmast-4-en-3-one ( 5 ), and β -sitosterol-3-O- β -D-glucoside ( 6 ). Structures were elucidated using NMR and MS techniques. Exploratory molecular docking was conducted to investigate potential binding modes toward falcipain-2. Antioxidant activity was assessed using DPPH and FRAP assays, and isolated compounds were screened for antiplasmodial activity against both parasite strains. The crude extract exhibited good antiplasmodial activity with IC 50 values of 13.0 ± 2.0 μg/mL (PfDd2) and 8.6 ± 2.3 μg/mL (Pf3D7). Among the fractions, fraction C showed the highest activity (12.7 ± 0.2 μg/mL; 8.0 ± 1.5 μg/mL), followed by fraction B, A, and D. Six known compounds were isolated, with compounds 1 , 3 , and 5 reported for the first time in the Anacardiaceae family. Docking analysis yielded modest predicted binding energies (−5.4 to −6.8 kcal/mol) and did not show a clear correlation with experimental antiplasmodial activity, suggesting that strong falcipain-2 inhibition is unlikely to represent the primary mechanism of action. All samples demonstrated antioxidant activity, and compound 1 exhibited the strongest effect (DPPH IC 50 = 59.6 ± 10.4 μg/mL; FRAP IC 50 = 69.1 ± 0.2 μg/mL). In antiplasmodial assay, the isolated compounds exhibited weak to moderate activity, with compound 1 showing the lowest IC 50 values among them (31.6 ± 2.9 μM for PfDd2 and 22.1 ± 0.1 μM for Pf3D7). The findings provide preliminary pharmacological support for the traditional antimalarial use of H. barteri . In vitro assays indicate that several constituents may contribute to the observed inhibition of Plasmodium growth, with compound 1 showing moderate activity. Compounds 1 , 3 , and 5 were identified in the Anacardiaceae family for the first time, highlighting their potential as phytochemical markers. • Haematostaphis barteri stem-bark extract exhibited notable in vitro activity against P. falciparum Dd2 and 3D7. • Fractionation yielded six known compounds, three reported for the first time in Anacardiaceae. • 3- O -methylellagic acid-4′- O - α -rhamnopyranoside ( 1) showed the most favorable falcipain-2 docking score and the highest antioxidant activity among the isolated compounds. • Compound 1 exhibited the most potent antiplasmodial effect among all isolated constituents. • Findings support the traditional antimalarial use of H. barteri and identify compound 1 as a potential phytochemical marker contributing to the extract’s activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crude stem bark extract showed good in vitro antiplasmodial activity against P. falciparum Dd2, IC50 13.0 ± 2.0 μg/mL.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
antiplasmodial activitye0
Value
13.0 ± 2.0 μg/mLe0
Qualifier
PfDd2e0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“The crude extract exhibited good antiplasmodial activity with IC 50 values of 13.0 ± 2.0 μg/mL (PfDd2) and 8.6 ± 2.3 μg/mL (Pf3D7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1609 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crude stem bark extract showed good in vitro antiplasmodial activity against P. falciparum 3D7, IC50 8.6 ± 2.3 μg/mL.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
antiplasmodial activitye0
Value
8.6 ± 2.3 μg/mLe0
Qualifier
Pf3D7e0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“The crude extract exhibited good antiplasmodial activity with IC 50 values of 13.0 ± 2.0 μg/mL (PfDd2) and 8.6 ± 2.3 μg/mL (Pf3D7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1609 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the fractions, fraction C showed the highest antiplasmodial activity, followed by fractions B, A and D.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.7 ± 0.2 μg/mL; 8.0 ± 1.5 μg/mLe0
Qualifier
fraction Ce0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the fractions, fraction C showed the highest activity (12.7 ± 0.2 μg/mL; 8.0 ± 1.5 μg/mL), followed by fraction B, A, and D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1740 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six known compounds were isolated from the stem bark extract.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
known compounds were isolatede0
Value
Sixe0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Six known compounds were isolated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compounds 1, 3 and 5 were reported for the first time in the Anacardiaceae family.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
reported for the first time in the Anacardiaceae familye0
Qualifier
compounds 1 , 3 , and 5e0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“compounds 1 , 3 , and 5 reported for the first time in the Anacardiaceae family”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1861 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Docking of the isolated compounds toward falcipain-2 yielded modest predicted binding energies of -5.4 to -6.8 kcal/mol.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
predicted binding energiese0
Value
−5.4 to −6.8 kcal/mole0
Qualifier
modeste0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Docking analysis yielded modest predicted binding energies (−5.4 to −6.8 kcal/mol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–1945 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Docking scores did not show a clear correlation with experimental antiplasmodial activity.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Gene
falcipain-2e1
Outcome
experimental antiplasmodial activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“did not show a clear correlation with experimental antiplasmodial activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1950–2024 · show in text ↑
e1

“strong falcipain-2 inhibition is unlikely to represent the primary mechanism of action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2128 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Strong falcipain-2 inhibition is unlikely to be the primary mechanism of the antiplasmodial action.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Gene
falcipain-2e0
Outcome
primary mechanism of actione0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“strong falcipain-2 inhibition is unlikely to represent the primary mechanism of action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Compound 1 showed the most favorable falcipain-2 docking score.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Gene
falcipain-2e0
Outcome
falcipain-2 docking scoree0
Direction
most favorablee0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“showed the most favorable falcipain-2 docking score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3169–3220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All samples demonstrated antioxidant activity.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“All samples demonstrated antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2130–2175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound 1 showed the strongest antioxidant effect in the DPPH assay, IC50 59.6 ± 10.4 μg/mL.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
DPPH IC 50e0
Direction
strongeste0
Value
59.6 ± 10.4 μg/mLe0
Qualifier
compound 1e0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“compound 1 exhibited the strongest effect (DPPH IC 50 = 59.6 ± 10.4 μg/mL; FRAP IC 50 = 69.1 ± 0.2 μg/mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2181–2286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound 1 showed the strongest antioxidant effect in the FRAP assay, IC50 69.1 ± 0.2 μg/mL.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
FRAP IC 50e0
Direction
strongeste0
Value
69.1 ± 0.2 μg/mLe0
Qualifier
compound 1e0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“compound 1 exhibited the strongest effect (DPPH IC 50 = 59.6 ± 10.4 μg/mL; FRAP IC 50 = 69.1 ± 0.2 μg/mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2181–2286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolated compounds showed weak to moderate antiplasmodial activity.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
activitye0
Value
weak to moderatee0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“the isolated compounds exhibited weak to moderate activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2313–2371 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound 1 had the lowest IC50 among the isolated compounds against PfDd2, 31.6 ± 2.9 μM.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
IC 50 valuese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
31.6 ± 2.9 μMe0
Qualifier
PfDd2e0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“the isolated compounds exhibited weak to moderate activity, with compound 1 showing the lowest IC 50 values among them (31.6 ± 2.9 μM for PfDd2 and 22.1 ± 0.1 μM for Pf3D7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2313–2485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound 1 had the lowest IC50 among the isolated compounds against Pf3D7, 22.1 ± 0.1 μM.

Taxon
Haematostaphis barterit0
Organ / stage
stem barkt0
Outcome
IC 50 valuese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
22.1 ± 0.1 μMe0
Qualifier
Pf3D7e0

Verbatim

t0

“stem bark of Haematostaphis barteri Hook.f.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“the isolated compounds exhibited weak to moderate activity, with compound 1 showing the lowest IC 50 values among them (31.6 ± 2.9 μM for PfDd2 and 22.1 ± 0.1 μM for Pf3D7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2313–2485 · show in text ↑