Paper · 2010 · TSpace

Impact of salt stress on five varieties of Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars under laboratory condition

Datta, J.K.; Nag, S.; Banerjee, A.; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The impact of salt stress under different salinity level (0,25,50,75,100,125,150 mM NaCl ) on five varieties of Wheat viz., HOW-234, HD-2689, RAJ-4101, RAJ-4123, and HD-2045 was conducted. The data showed that different level of salinity significantly affected the growth attributes by reducing root and shoot length for salinity below 125mM. Fresh weight and dry weight of root and shoot were reduced significantly with subsequent treatment. Regarding germination maximum germination was found in variety HD2689 in all the treatments and maximum inhibition was found to be in case of HOW234 variety at 150mM salinity level. Regarding biochemical analysis the sugar, proline content increased with increasing salinity level where as protein content decreased in the physiologically active leaves of different treatments for all the varieties of wheat. @JASEM

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced wheat root length below 125mM.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
root and shoot lengthe0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
below 125mMe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different level of salinity significantly affected the growth attributes by reducing root and shoot length for salinity below 125mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–341 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced wheat shoot length below 125mM.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
below 125mMe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different level of salinity significantly affected the growth attributes by reducing root and shoot length for salinity below 125mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–341 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced root and shoot fresh weight.

Treatment
subsequent treatmente0
Outcome
Fresh weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh weight and dry weight of root and shoot were reduced significantly with subsequent treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–441 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced root and shoot dry weight.

Treatment
subsequent treatmente0
Outcome
dry weight of root and shoote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh weight and dry weight of root and shoot were reduced significantly with subsequent treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–441 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD2689 showed maximum germination under all treatments.

Material
HD2689e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum germination was found in variety HD2689 in all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–534 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HOW234 showed maximum inhibition at 150mM salinity.

Material
HOW234e0
Treatment
150mM salinity levele0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum inhibition was found to be in case of HOW234 variety at 150mM salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–623 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf sugar content increased with salinity.

Treatment
salinity levele0
Outcome
sugare0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sugar, proline content increased with increasing salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–723 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf proline content increased with salinity.

Treatment
salinity levele0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sugar, proline content increased with increasing salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–723 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf protein content decreased with salinity.

Organ / stage
physiologically active leavese0
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content decreased in the physiologically active leaves of different treatments for all the varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–850 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.