Paper · 2026 · Plant-Environment Interactions

Exogenous Glutathione and Nitric Oxide Improve Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize

Prodipto Bishnu Angon; Md. Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif; Md. Sarwar Jahan; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Maize ( Zea mays L.) is one of the major grain crops worldwide that is particularly vulnerable to waterlogging (WL) stress. Glutathione (GSH) and nitric oxide (NO) are known to protect plants from a variety of abiotic stresses; however, their potential for improving WL tolerance in maize remains unexplored. The present study examined the impact of exogenously applied GSH and NO on maize plants exposed to WL‐stress. Our findings revealed that GSH + NO‐treated waterlogged maize plants grew better and produced more biomass than only WL‐stressed plants. The improved performance of GSH + NO‐sprayed WL‐stressed maize seedlings was supported by the increased root dry and fresh weight, shoot length, shoot dry and fresh weight, chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , and carotenoid content. Exogenous GSH and NO treatments significantly enhanced the amounts of leaf proline, leaf soluble sugars, and total protein in maize seedlings, suggesting adaptive metabolic reprogramming under stress. The increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) in maize leaves and roots revealed that WL caused significant oxidative damage. Exogenous GSH, NO individually, and combinedly significantly decreased total H 2 O 2 and MDA contents in both leaves and roots. Exogenous GSH and NO reduced oxidative stress by increasing peroxidase activity, ascorbic acid, and anthocyanin content in maize leaf and root tissues. Our findings emphasize the possible relevance of GSH and NO, simultaneously and individually, in enhancing adaptive mechanisms in maize seedlings for reducing WL‐induced damage. Although the GSH + NO‐mediated approach shows promise for mitigating WL‐stress in maize under controlled conditions, further field‐based investigations are required to validate its practical applicability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH + NO treated waterlogged maize plants grew better and produced more biomass than waterlogged plants without treatment.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
GSH + NOe1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
grew bettere1
Comparator
only WL‐stressed plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“GSH + NO‐treated waterlogged maize plants grew better and produced more biomass than only WL‐stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH + NO treatment increased root dry and fresh weight of waterlogged maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote2
Treatment
GSH + NOe2
Outcome
root dry and fresh weighte2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“The improved performance of GSH + NO‐sprayed WL‐stressed maize seedlings was supported by the increased root dry and fresh weight, shoot length, shoot dry and fresh weight, chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , and carotenoid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH + NO treatment increased shoot length and shoot dry and fresh weight of waterlogged maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
shoote2
Treatment
GSH + NOe2
Outcome
shoot length, shoot dry and fresh weighte2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“The improved performance of GSH + NO‐sprayed WL‐stressed maize seedlings was supported by the increased root dry and fresh weight, shoot length, shoot dry and fresh weight, chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , and carotenoid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH + NO treatment increased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid content of waterlogged maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
GSH + NOe2
Outcome
chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , and carotenoid contente2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“The improved performance of GSH + NO‐sprayed WL‐stressed maize seedlings was supported by the increased root dry and fresh weight, shoot length, shoot dry and fresh weight, chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , and carotenoid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GSH and NO treatments significantly enhanced leaf proline, leaf soluble sugars and total protein in maize seedlings.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leafe3
Treatment
Exogenous GSH and NOe3
Outcome
leaf proline, leaf soluble sugars, and total proteine3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Exogenous GSH and NO treatments significantly enhanced the amounts of leaf proline, leaf soluble sugars, and total protein in maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in maize leaves and roots, indicating significant oxidative damage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse4
Treatment
WLe4
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) levelse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) in maize leaves and roots revealed that WL caused significant oxidative damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased hydrogen peroxide accumulation in maize leaves and roots.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse4
Treatment
WLe4
Outcome
accumulation of hydrogen peroxidee4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) in maize leaves and roots revealed that WL caused significant oxidative damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GSH alone significantly decreased total H2O2 and MDA contents in maize leaves and roots under waterlogging.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse5
Treatment
Exogenous GSHe5
Outcome
total H 2 O 2 and MDA contentse5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“Exogenous GSH, NO individually, and combinedly significantly decreased total H 2 O 2 and MDA contents in both leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous NO alone significantly decreased total H2O2 and MDA contents in maize leaves and roots under waterlogging.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse5
Treatment
NOe5
Outcome
total H 2 O 2 and MDA contentse5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“Exogenous GSH, NO individually, and combinedly significantly decreased total H 2 O 2 and MDA contents in both leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined GSH and NO significantly decreased total H2O2 and MDA contents in maize leaves and roots under waterlogging.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse5
Treatment
combinedlye5
Outcome
total H 2 O 2 and MDA contentse5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“Exogenous GSH, NO individually, and combinedly significantly decreased total H 2 O 2 and MDA contents in both leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GSH and NO increased peroxidase activity, ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content in maize leaf and root tissues.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leaf and root tissuese6
Treatment
Exogenous GSH and NOe6
Outcome
peroxidase activity, ascorbic acid, and anthocyanin contente6
Direction
increasinge6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Exogenous GSH and NO reduced oxidative stress by increasing peroxidase activity, ascorbic acid, and anthocyanin content in maize leaf and root tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous GSH and NO reduced oxidative stress in waterlogged maize seedlings.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Exogenous GSH and NOe6
Outcome
oxidative stresse6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterlogging Stress Tolerance in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Exogenous GSH and NO reduced oxidative stress by increasing peroxidase activity, ascorbic acid, and anthocyanin content in maize leaf and root tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1445 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitric oxide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitric oxide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitric oxide · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitric oxide · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glutathione · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

glutathione · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

glutathione · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.