Paper · 2026 · Forest Ecology and Management

Legacy P from rock phosphate promotes growth of eucalypt coppice stands without further P application

Adam da Cruz Rodrigues; Cassio Rafael Costa dos Santos; Maria Leidiane Reis Barreto; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The need for efficient use of phosphate fertilizers is reinforced by climate change and the global demand for sustainable resource management. Eucalypt stands in tropical soils require phosphorus (P) fertilization to ensure good productivity. Although low-solubility sources (rock phosphate, RP) promote lower productivity than high-solubility sources (single superphosphate, SSP), they promote high soil P levels over time, potentially supporting successive rotations — a legacy effect. This study evaluated how high- and low-solubility phosphates applied as single or combined P sources (PM) in the first rotation influenced the growth of Eucalyptus grandis coppice stands without further P fertilization, investigating the role of legacy P in these processes. Growth and aboveground biomass were measured across two rotations. The relationship between coppice stand growth and soil P fractions at multiple depths at the end of the first rotation was analyzed. Growth patterns shifted between rotations; RP and control treatments achieved equal or greater growth in the second rotation than SSP during the first one (±47 m 3 ha −1 yr −1 ). Coppice stands invested more in wood biomass production, accounting for ±75% of the total biomass across all ages. High soil P levels from RP application led to sustained productivity, with PM demonstrating the most efficient biomass conversion. Deeper soil P pools (20–40 cm) were functionally relevant for tree growth in the second rotation. The RP legacy effect highlights its strong potential as an alternative P source, particularly under minimum tillage and coppice management, offering a strategy for sustainable productivity of tropical forest plantations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate and control treatments achieved equal or greater growth in the second rotation than single superphosphate did in the first rotation (about 47 m3 ha-1 yr-1).

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise2
Treatment
rock phosphatee1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
±47 m 3 ha −1 yr −1e0
Comparator
SSPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RP and control treatments achieved equal or greater growth in the second rotation than SSP during the first one (±47 m 3 ha −1 yr −1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1006–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“low-solubility sources (rock phosphate, RP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–295 · show in text ↑
e2

“the growth of Eucalyptus grandis coppice stands without further P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coppice stands invested more in wood biomass production, accounting for about 75% of total biomass across all ages.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise0
Outcome
wood biomass productione1
Value
±75%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of Eucalyptus grandis coppice stands without further P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“Coppice stands invested more in wood biomass production, accounting for ±75% of the total biomass across all ages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High soil P levels from rock phosphate application are associated with sustained productivity of the coppice stands.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise0
Treatment
RP applicatione1
Outcome
sustained productivitye1
Qualifier
High soil P levelse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of Eucalyptus grandis coppice stands without further P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“High soil P levels from RP application led to sustained productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined P sources (PM) showed the most efficient biomass conversion among the phosphate sources.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise0
Treatment
PMe2
Outcome
biomass conversione1
Direction
most efficiente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of Eucalyptus grandis coppice stands without further P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“with PM demonstrating the most efficient biomass conversion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1386 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined P sources (PM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–593 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deeper soil P pools (20-40 cm) were functionally relevant for tree growth in the second rotation.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise0
Outcome
tree growthe1
Qualifier
in the second rotatione1
Setting
20–40 cme1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of Eucalyptus grandis coppice stands without further P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deeper soil P pools (20–40 cm) were functionally relevant for tree growth in the second rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The rock phosphate legacy effect indicates strong potential as an alternative P source, particularly under minimum tillage and coppice management.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise0
Outcome
alternative P sourcee1
Qualifier
particularly under minimum tillage and coppice managemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of Eucalyptus grandis coppice stands without further P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RP legacy effect highlights its strong potential as an alternative P source, particularly under minimum tillage and coppice management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1624 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Eucalyptus grandis (rose gum)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.