Paper · 1992 · Plant Cell & Environment

Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus availability on the growth response ofEucalyptus grandisto high CO2

J. P. CONROY; P. J. MILHAM; E. W. R. BARLOW

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
119
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The response of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings to elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations was examined by growing seedlings at either 340 or 660 n mol CO 2 mol ‐1 for 6 weeks. Graded increments of phosphorus and nitrogen fertilizers were added to a soil deficient in these nutrients to establish if the growth response to increasing nutrient availability was affected by CO 2 concentration. At 660 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 , seedling dry weight was up to five times greater than at 340 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 . The absolute response was largest when both nitrogen and phosphorus availability was high but the relative increase in dry weight was greatest at low phosphorus availability. At 340 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 and high nitrogen availability, growth was stimulated by addition of phosphorus up to 76 mg kg 1 soil. Further additions of phosphorus had little effect. However, at 660 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 , growth only began to plateau at a phosphorus addition rate of 920mg kg ‐1 soil. At 340 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 and high phosphorus availability, increasing nitrogen from 40 to 160mg kg ‐1 soil had little effect on plant growth. At high CO 2 , growth reached a maximum at between 80 and 160mg nitrogen kg ‐1 soil. Total uptake of phosphorus was greater at high CO 2 concentration at all fertilizer addition rates, but nitrogen uptake was either lower or unchanged at high CO 2 concentration except at the highest nitrogen fertilizer rate. The shoot to root ratio was increased by CO 2 enrichment, primarily because the specific leaf weight was greater. The nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in the foliage was lower at elevated CO 2 concentration partly because of the higher specific leaf weight. These results indicate that critical foliar concentrations currently used to define nutritional status and fertilizer management may need to be reassessed as the atmospheric CO 2 concentration rises.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated CO2, seedling dry weight was up to five times greater than at ambient CO2.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
660 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1e0
Outcome
seedling dry weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
up to five timese0
Comparator
340 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 660 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 , seedling dry weight was up to five times greater than at 340 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The absolute dry-weight response was largest with high nitrogen and phosphorus availability.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
nitrogen and phosphorus availability was highe0
Outcome
absolute responsee0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The absolute response was largest when both nitrogen and phosphorus availability was high but the relative increase in dry weight was greatest at low phosphorus availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative dry-weight increase was greatest at low phosphorus availability.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
low phosphorus availabilitye0
Outcome
relative increase in dry weighte0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The absolute response was largest when both nitrogen and phosphorus availability was high but the relative increase in dry weight was greatest at low phosphorus availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ambient CO2 and high nitrogen, adding phosphorus stimulated growth up to 76 mg kg 1 soil.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
addition of phosphoruse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
76 mg kg 1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 340 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 and high nitrogen availability, growth was stimulated by addition of phosphorus up to 76 mg kg 1 soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further phosphorus addition had little effect on growth at ambient CO2.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
Further additions of phosphoruse0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further additions of phosphorus had little effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At elevated CO2, growth plateaued only at 920mg kg ‐1 soil phosphorus addition.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
phosphorus additione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
plateaue0
Value
920mg kg ‐1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, at 660 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 , growth only began to plateau at a phosphorus addition rate of 920mg kg ‐1 soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ambient CO2 and high phosphorus, raising nitrogen from 40 to 160mg kg ‐1 soil had little effect on growth.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
increasing nitrogen from 40 to 160mg kg ‐1 soile0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 340 μmol CO 2 mol ‐1 and high phosphorus availability, increasing nitrogen from 40 to 160mg kg ‐1 soil had little effect on plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high CO2, growth reached a maximum between 80 and 160mg nitrogen kg ‐1 soil.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
between 80 and 160mg nitrogen kg ‐1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“At high CO 2 , growth reached a maximum at between 80 and 160mg nitrogen kg ‐1 soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phosphorus uptake was greater at high CO2 across fertilizer rates.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
high CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
Total uptake of phosphoruse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total uptake of phosphorus was greater at high CO 2 concentration at all fertilizer addition rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake under high CO2 was lower or unchanged except at the highest nitrogen rate.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
high CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
except at the highest nitrogen fertilizer ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“nitrogen uptake was either lower or unchanged at high CO 2 concentration except at the highest nitrogen fertilizer rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment increased the shoot-to-root ratio.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
shoot to root ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The shoot to root ratio was increased by CO 2 enrichment, primarily because the specific leaf weight was greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf weight was greater under CO2 enrichment.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
specific leaf weighte0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The shoot to root ratio was increased by CO 2 enrichment, primarily because the specific leaf weight was greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered foliar nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
elevated CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in the foliagee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in the foliage was lower at elevated CO 2 concentration partly because of the higher specific leaf weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered foliar phosphorus concentration.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Treatment
elevated CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
phosphorus concentration in the foliagee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in the foliage was lower at elevated CO 2 concentration partly because of the higher specific leaf weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1686 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reassessing critical foliar nutrient concentrations as atmospheric CO2 rises.

Taxon
Eucalyptus grandisEucalyptus grandise1
Outcome
critical foliar concentrations currently used to define nutritional status and fertilizer management may need to be reassessede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“critical foliar concentrations currently used to define nutritional status and fertilizer management may need to be reassessed as the atmospheric CO 2 concentration rises.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1886 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Eucalyptus grandis (rose gum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · growth · Eucalyptus grandis (rose gum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Eucalyptus grandis (rose gum)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.