Paper · 2026 · Kirkuk University Journal For Agricultural Sciences

Growth, yield performance of apple trees by adding some organic treatments

mohamed El-Sherpiny; Mustafa AL-Hadethi

13
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted on "Ibrahimi" apple trees during the 2021 growing season. The trees, which were planted at a 5 × 5 m size in a private apple orchard in Youssoufia city, southwest of the Baghdad Governorate, were about 5 years old when they budded on quince rootstock. Factors of study experiment included adding zeolite in four levels; zero (Z1), 1 kg.tree-1 (Z2), 2 kg.tree-1 (Z3) and 3 kg.tree-1 (Z4) and three levels of peanut shells compost, without adding (P1), addition at 250 g.tree-1 (P2) and addition at 500 g.tree-1 (P3). Replications number was three (two trees in experimental unit) designed at factorial experiment in a R. C. B. D. number of trees used was 72 trees. Experimental results showed that interaction between zeolite and peanut shells compost had a major impact, particularly when interaction treatment (Z4P3) were given 22.22 cm2, 29.82 cm, 31.92 mg.g-1 fresh weight, and 36.06 % as leaf area, increase in shoot length, leaves chlorophyll content, and leaf dry weight, respectively. Moreover, given 2.00 %, 0.430 %, 1.88 % and 97.50 mg.kg-1, as leaf N, P, K and Fe content, respectively. As for yield characteristics, it has been given 41.23 g, 4.12 cm, 25.00 kg and 11.74 % as fruit weight, fruit diameter, tree yield and T.S.S, respectively. Finally, it can be concluded from this research that adding zeolite had an important role in improving availability of soil elements and organic matter, especially when this addition was combined with peanut shells compost and this effect had a positive impact on vegetative and fruit growth characteristics of apple trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zeolite 3 kg per tree plus peanut shell compost 500 g per tree treatment (Z4P3) gave a leaf area of 22.22 cm2 in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
22.22 cm2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“when interaction treatment (Z4P3) were given 22.22 cm2, 29.82 cm, 31.92 mg.g-1 fresh weight, and 36.06 % as leaf area, increase in shoot length, leaves chlorophyll content, and leaf dry weight, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a shoot length increase of 29.82 cm in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
29.82 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“when interaction treatment (Z4P3) were given 22.22 cm2, 29.82 cm, 31.92 mg.g-1 fresh weight, and 36.06 % as leaf area, increase in shoot length, leaves chlorophyll content, and leaf dry weight, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a leaf chlorophyll content of 31.92 mg g-1 fresh weight in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
31.92 mg.g-1 fresh weighte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“when interaction treatment (Z4P3) were given 22.22 cm2, 29.82 cm, 31.92 mg.g-1 fresh weight, and 36.06 % as leaf area, increase in shoot length, leaves chlorophyll content, and leaf dry weight, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a leaf dry weight of 36.06 % in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
leaf dry weighte1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
36.06 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“when interaction treatment (Z4P3) were given 22.22 cm2, 29.82 cm, 31.92 mg.g-1 fresh weight, and 36.06 % as leaf area, increase in shoot length, leaves chlorophyll content, and leaf dry weight, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a leaf N content of 2.00 % in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
leaf Ne1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
2.00 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“given 2.00 %, 0.430 %, 1.88 % and 97.50 mg.kg-1, as leaf N, P, K and Fe content, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a leaf P content of 0.430 % in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
Pe1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
0.430 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“given 2.00 %, 0.430 %, 1.88 % and 97.50 mg.kg-1, as leaf N, P, K and Fe content, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a leaf K content of 1.88 % in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
Ke1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
1.88 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“given 2.00 %, 0.430 %, 1.88 % and 97.50 mg.kg-1, as leaf N, P, K and Fe content, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a leaf Fe content of 97.50 mg kg-1 in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
Fe contente1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
97.50 mg.kg-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“given 2.00 %, 0.430 %, 1.88 % and 97.50 mg.kg-1, as leaf N, P, K and Fe content, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a fruit weight of 41.23 g in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
fruit weighte1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
41.23 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“it has been given 41.23 g, 4.12 cm, 25.00 kg and 11.74 % as fruit weight, fruit diameter, tree yield and T.S.S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a fruit diameter of 4.12 cm in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
fruit diametere1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
4.12 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“it has been given 41.23 g, 4.12 cm, 25.00 kg and 11.74 % as fruit weight, fruit diameter, tree yield and T.S.S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a tree yield of 25.00 kg in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
tree yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
25.00 kge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“it has been given 41.23 g, 4.12 cm, 25.00 kg and 11.74 % as fruit weight, fruit diameter, tree yield and T.S.S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z4P3 gave a total soluble solids content of 11.74 % in apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
interaction treatment (Z4P3)e0
Outcome
T.S.Se1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
11.74 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction treatment (Z4P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“it has been given 41.23 g, 4.12 cm, 25.00 kg and 11.74 % as fruit weight, fruit diameter, tree yield and T.S.S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that adding zeolite, especially combined with peanut shell compost, improved soil element availability and had a positive impact on vegetative and fruit growth characteristics of apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
adding zeolitee0
Outcome
vegetative and fruit growth characteristicse0
Direction
positive impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adding zeolite had an important role in improving availability of soil elements and organic matter, especially when this addition was combined with peanut shells compost and this effect had a positive impact on vegetative and fruit growth characteristics of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1600 · show in text ↑

other · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.