Paper · 2026 · Agriculture

Seedling Production of Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) on Different Substrates Using Wastewater from a Recirculating Aquaculture System

Wagner Junio de Freitas Martins; Nárcia Carolina Santos da Silva; Thamara Bentivole Magalhães; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study evaluated cherry tomato seedling production using pirapitinga RAS wastewater as the sole nutrient source in four substrate formulations: T1 (sand, gravel and coconut fiber), T2 (sand and gravel), T3 (gravel and coconut fiber), and T4 (sand and coconut fiber). No differences were observed for germination quality, germination percentage, seedling vigor index, germination vigor index, moisture content, total wet biomass, total dry biomass, or mortality. For small plants, leaf number (LN) was higher in T2 and lower in T4, while root length was greater in T3. The number of medium plants was higher in T3 and lower in T4; LN was higher in T1 and T2 and lowest in T3. For large plants, LN was higher in T1 and T2 and lower in T3; total length was higher in T1 and lower in T3 and T4. Visual differences in substrate water retention were observed: T4 exhibited rapid surface drying, T1 and T2 showed moderate moisture persistence, and T3 maintained surface water. Leaf yellowing was observed after 25 days, suggesting possible nutrient limitation or reduced nutrient availability at the measured pH. These findings indicate that substrate physical characteristics influence early seedling growth performance, whereas pirapitinga RAS wastewater can serve as a viable nutrient source.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination, vigor, biomass, moisture and mortality did not differ among substrates.

Treatment
Different Substratest1
Outcome
germination quality, germination percentage, seedling vigor index, germination vigor index, moisture content, total wet biomass, total dry biomass, or mortalitye0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“Different Substrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“No differences were observed for germination quality, germination percentage, seedling vigor index, germination vigor index, moisture content, total wet biomass, total dry biomass, or mortality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–465 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small plants had higher leaf number in T2 and lower leaf number in T4.

Organ / stage
small plantse0
Outcome
leaf numbere0
Direction
higher in T2 and lower in T4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“For small plants, leaf number (LN) was higher in T2 and lower in T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–533 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small plants had greater root length in T3.

Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“root length was greater in T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium plant number was higher in T3 and lower in T4.

Outcome
number of medium plantse0
Direction
higher in T3 and lower in T4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of medium plants was higher in T3 and lower in T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium plants had higher leaf number in T1 and T2 and lowest in T3.

Outcome
LNe0
Direction
higher in T1 and T2 and lowest in T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“LN was higher in T1 and T2 and lowest in T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large plants had higher leaf number in T1 and T2 and lower in T3.

Organ / stage
large plantse0
Outcome
LNe0
Direction
higher in T1 and T2 and lower in T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“For large plants, LN was higher in T1 and T2 and lower in T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–739 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large plants had higher total length in T1 and lower length in T3 and T4.

Outcome
total lengthe0
Direction
higher in T1 and lower in T3 and T4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“total length was higher in T1 and lower in T3 and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 dried rapidly at the surface, T1 and T2 retained moderate moisture, and T3 maintained surface water.

Outcome
surface dryinge0
Qualifier
T4 exhibited rapid surface drying, T1 and T2 showed moderate moisture persistence, and T3 maintained surface watere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“T4 exhibited rapid surface drying, T1 and T2 showed moderate moisture persistence, and T3 maintained surface water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf yellowing appeared after 25 days, suggesting nutrient limitation or reduced availability at the measured pH.

Outcome
Leaf yellowinge0
Value
25 dayse0
Qualifier
possible nutrient limitation or reduced nutrient availability at the measured pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf yellowing was observed after 25 days, suggesting possible nutrient limitation or reduced nutrient availability at the measured pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pirapitinga RAS wastewater was judged a viable nutrient source for seedlings.

Outcome
pirapitinga RAS wastewater can serve as a viable nutrient sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“pirapitinga RAS wastewater can serve as a viable nutrient source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1291 · show in text ↑

growing medium · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.