Abstract
The article presents the results of research (2024-2025) to identify the role of variety and mineral nutrition in obtaining high grain yields of spring wheat suitable for breadmaking. Objects of study were spring soft wheat varieties of domestic selection zoned in the Republic of Tatarstan. Yoldyz variety (standard); Alvaris; Burlak; Khayat; Ulyanovskaya 105 and Ekada 214. The experimental scheme included two factors: A – nutrition background (without fertilizers – control), fertilized background – N123P130K89 kg/active ingredient calculated for 4 tons of grain per 1 ha; factor B - the above-mentioned spring wheat varieties were tested on each nutrition background. Gray forest soil with a humus content of 3.0-3.2% (according to Tyurin), mobile phosphorus 66.0-73.0 and exchangeable potassium 98.0-102.0 mg/kg of soil (according to Kirsanov), pHsalt - 5.0-5.5. In 2024 growing season conditions (hydrothermal coefficient (HTC) of 0.71), the grain yield increase under fertilized conditions compared to the control was 0.2 t/ha for Khayat variety, 0.65 t/ha for the Alvaris variety and 0.78-1.11 t/ha, respectively, under more favorable weather conditions in 2025. It was found that spring wheat varieties Alvaris, Burlak and Ekada 214 exhibit the greatest responsiveness to mineral fertilizers in gray forest soil conditions, providing not only a yield increase of up to 0.88 t/ha, but also improved grain quality, which corresponds to Class 3 according to GOST R 52554-2006.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization increased Khayat yield by 0.2 t/ha in 2024.
Verbatim
e0“In 2024 growing season conditions (hydrothermal coefficient (HTC) of 0.71), the grain yield increase under fertilized conditions compared to the control was 0.2 t/ha for Khayat variety, 0.65 t/ha for the Alvaris variety and 0.78-1.11 t/ha, respectively, under more favorable weather conditions in 2025.”
t0“SPRING SOFT WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization increased Alvaris yield by 0.65 t/ha in 2024.
Verbatim
e0“In 2024 growing season conditions (hydrothermal coefficient (HTC) of 0.71), the grain yield increase under fertilized conditions compared to the control was 0.2 t/ha for Khayat variety, 0.65 t/ha for the Alvaris variety and 0.78-1.11 t/ha, respectively, under more favorable weather conditions in 2025.”
t0“SPRING SOFT WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilized varieties gained 0.78-1.11 t/ha in the more favorable 2025 season.
Verbatim
e0“the grain yield increase under fertilized conditions compared to the control was 0.2 t/ha for Khayat variety, 0.65 t/ha for the Alvaris variety and 0.78-1.11 t/ha, respectively, under more favorable weather conditions in 2025.”
t0“SPRING SOFT WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Alvaris showed among the greatest responses to mineral fertilizers.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Material
- Alvarise0
- Treatment
- mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- greatest responsivenesse0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- up to 0.88 t/hae0
- Setting
- gray forest soil conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spring wheat varieties Alvaris, Burlak and Ekada 214 exhibit the greatest responsiveness to mineral fertilizers in gray forest soil conditions, providing not only a yield increase of up to 0.88 t/ha, but also improved grain quality, which corresponds to Class 3 according to GOST R 52554-2006.”
Claim · model-written summary
Burlak showed among the greatest responses to mineral fertilizers.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Burlake0
- Treatment
- mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- greatest responsivenesse0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- up to 0.88 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spring wheat varieties Alvaris, Burlak and Ekada 214 exhibit the greatest responsiveness to mineral fertilizers in gray forest soil conditions, providing not only a yield increase of up to 0.88 t/ha, but also improved grain quality, which corresponds to Class 3 according to GOST R 52554-2006.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ekada 214 showed among the greatest responses to mineral fertilizers.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Ekada 214e0
- Treatment
- mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- greatest responsivenesse0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- up to 0.88 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spring wheat varieties Alvaris, Burlak and Ekada 214 exhibit the greatest responsiveness to mineral fertilizers in gray forest soil conditions, providing not only a yield increase of up to 0.88 t/ha, but also improved grain quality, which corresponds to Class 3 according to GOST R 52554-2006.”
Claim · model-written summary
Responsive varieties attained improved grain quality corresponding to Class 3.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- grain qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- Class 3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spring wheat varieties Alvaris, Burlak and Ekada 214 exhibit the greatest responsiveness to mineral fertilizers in gray forest soil conditions, providing not only a yield increase of up to 0.88 t/ha, but also improved grain quality, which corresponds to Class 3 according to GOST R 52554-2006.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
150 papers more in this group
See all 154 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.