Paper · 2026 · Soil Use and Management

Indexing Soil Quality Over 45 Years of Long‐Term Fertilization in an Acid Alfisol of North Western Himalayas

Neha Chauhan; Narender Kumar Sankhyan; Raj Paul Sharma; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sustaining long‐term crop productivity and soil quality are essential for the stability of agricultural ecosystems. However, prolonged use of unbalanced chemical fertilizers under intensive cropping systems consistently degrades soil quality and threatens sustained productivity. Hence, a comprehensive evaluation of long‐term fertilizer experiments and their effect on soil quality is essential to determine the best practices that support soil functionality and sustains crop yields. The present study evaluates the effects of 45 years of fertilization on soil quality in wheat under maize–wheat cropping system experiment in an acid Alfisol . Physical, chemical and biological soil quality indicators were analysed at two soil layers viz. (0–15 and 15–30 cm) under 11 treatments comprising different fertilizer and amendment regimes, that is, 50% NPK, 100% NPK, 150% NPK, 100% NPK + hand weeding, 100% NPK + Zn, 100% NP, 100% N, 100% NPK + farmyard manure (FYM), 100% NPK (‐S), 100% NPK + lime and control, arranged in a randomized complete block design. Results from the present study indicated that, balanced dose of NPK application in combination with FYM or lime significantly enhanced wheat grain yield by ~53.9% and ~41.2%, respectively, over sole 100% NPK fertilizers. FYM and lime amended treatments notably reduced soil bulk density, enhanced nutrient availability, and microbial indicators relative to control, 100% NPK and imbalanced fertilizer treatments. Furthermore, principal component analysis (PCA) was computed to identify key soil quality indicators in both soil layers. In the surface soil layer, the highest value of soil quality index (SQI) was observed under 100% NPK + FYM (0.99), followed by 100% NPK + lime (0.97), whereas omission of N, P, K or S led to substantial reduction in SQI. Contrarily, the value of SQI decreased in the sub‐surface layer. Among the selected soil quality indicators, highest contribution towards SQI at surface soil layer was of soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN; 85%), followed by pH (10%) and water holding capacity (4%), whereas in sub‐surface soil, bulk density (70%), pH (26%) and available sulphur (4%) were primary contributors. Additionally, except bulk and particle density all other soil quality indicators correlated positively with wheat grain yield. Hence, these findings emphasize the critical role of continuous soil quality monitoring and the integrated use of balanced fertilizers, organic amendments, and lime to maintain soil health and optimize crop yields in acid Alfisols .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with farmyard manure increased wheat grain yield by about 53.9% over sole NPK.

Treatment
NPK application in combination with FYMe0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
~53.9%e0
Comparator
sole 100% NPK fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“balanced dose of NPK application in combination with FYM or lime significantly enhanced wheat grain yield by ~53.9% and ~41.2%, respectively, over sole 100% NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with lime increased wheat grain yield by about 41.2% over sole NPK.

Treatment
limee0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
~41.2%e0
Comparator
sole 100% NPK fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“balanced dose of NPK application in combination with FYM or lime significantly enhanced wheat grain yield by ~53.9% and ~41.2%, respectively, over sole 100% NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure and lime treatments reduced soil bulk density compared with control and fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
FYM and lime amended treatmentse0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control, 100% NPK and imbalanced fertilizer treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM and lime amended treatments notably reduced soil bulk density, enhanced nutrient availability, and microbial indicators relative to control, 100% NPK and imbalanced fertilizer treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1479 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat under maize–wheat cropping system experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure and lime treatments enhanced nutrient availability and microbial indicators.

Treatment
FYM and lime amended treatmentse0
Outcome
nutrient availability, and microbial indicatorse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control, 100% NPK and imbalanced fertilizer treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM and lime amended treatments notably reduced soil bulk density, enhanced nutrient availability, and microbial indicators relative to control, 100% NPK and imbalanced fertilizer treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1479 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat under maize–wheat cropping system experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–633 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil quality index was highest under NPK with farmyard manure, at 0.99.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYMe0
Outcome
soil quality index (SQI)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.99e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the surface soil layer, the highest value of soil quality index (SQI) was observed under 100% NPK + FYM (0.99)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1715 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil quality index under NPK with lime was 0.97.

Outcome
100% NPK + limee0
Value
0.97e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 100% NPK + lime (0.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omission of N, P, K or S substantially reduced soil quality index.

Treatment
omission of N, P, K or Se0
Outcome
SQIe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“omission of N, P, K or S led to substantial reduction in SQI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality index decreased in the subsurface layer.

Outcome
SQIe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonOrgan / stage

Verbatim

e0

“the value of SQI decreased in the sub‐surface layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–1886 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All soil quality indicators except bulk and particle density correlated positively with wheat grain yield.

Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
except bulk and particle densitye0
Comparator
soil quality indicatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except bulk and particle density all other soil quality indicators correlated positively with wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2330 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

94 papers: 74 positive, 20 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

98 papers: 85 positive, 13 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    A small continuous potassium supply until heading produced better grain quality than the same amount absorbed only in the first month.

    THE EFFECT OF POTASSIUM SUPPLY ON THE COMPOSITION AND QUALITY OF WHEAT · 1934 · compared with plants which absorbed the same amount of potassium in the first month of growth, but none from then on

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.