Paper · 2014 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Continuous Use of Chemical Fertilizers and Manure on Soil Fertility and Productivity of Maize–Wheat under Rainfed Conditions of the Western Himalayas

Upinder Sharma; S. S. Paliyal; S. P. Sharma; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Long-term effects of continuous use of chemical fertilizers and manure on soil fertility and productivity of a maize–wheat system were investigated in the ongoing long-term fertilizer experiment, during rabi (2007–2008) and kharif (2008) seasons at the research farm of Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University–Hill Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Dhaulakuan. After 16 cropping cycles, bulk density decreased in plots where farmyard manure (FYM) was applied, whereas pH decreased in all the treatments. The organic carbon content of the soil increased in all the treatments except 100% nitrogen (N). Cation exchange capacity (CEC) increased in all the treatments over the initial status of the soil. Available N showed buildup over the initial status in most of the treatments. Available phosphorus (P) declined from initial status in treatments where only N was applied alone or with FYM. There was reduction in available potassium (K) status in all the treatments except 100% NPK. Continuous addition of FYM with balanced application of inorganic fertilizers improved content of exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) over initial status compared to imbalanced application of fertilizers. Continuous use of imbalanced inorganic fertilizers resulted in lesser crop yields and nutrient uptake compared to that with the application of balanced dose of inorganic fertilizers with FYM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure reduced soil bulk density after 16 cropping cycles.

Taxon
maize–wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
After 16 cropping cyclese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 16 cropping cycles, bulk density decreased in plots where farmyard manure (FYM) was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH decreased under all treatments.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH decreased in all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon increased under every treatment except 100% nitrogen.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
all the treatments except 100% nitrogen (N)e0
Outcome
organic carbon content of the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic carbon content of the soil increased in all the treatments except 100% nitrogen (N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEC increased from initial soil status under all treatments.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
Cation exchange capacity (CEC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
initial status of the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cation exchange capacity (CEC) increased in all the treatments over the initial status of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil N built up in most treatments.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
most of the treatmentse0
Outcome
Available Ne0
Direction
buildupe0
Comparator
initial statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Available N showed buildup over the initial status in most of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil P declined where N alone or N with FYM was applied.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
only N was applied alone or with FYMe0
Outcome
Available phosphorus (P)e0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
initial statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Available phosphorus (P) declined from initial status in treatments where only N was applied alone or with FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil K declined under all treatments except 100% NPK.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
all the treatments except 100% NPKe0
Outcome
available potassium (K) statuse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was reduction in available potassium (K) status in all the treatments except 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus balanced inorganic fertilizer improved exchangeable calcium relative to imbalanced fertilizer.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
Continuous addition of FYM with balanced application of inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
exchangeable calcium (Ca)e0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
imbalanced application of fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous addition of FYM with balanced application of inorganic fertilizers improved content of exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) over initial status compared to imbalanced application of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus balanced inorganic fertilizer improved exchangeable magnesium relative to imbalanced fertilizer.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
Continuous addition of FYM with balanced application of inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
magnesium (Mg)e0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
imbalanced application of fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous addition of FYM with balanced application of inorganic fertilizers improved content of exchangeable calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) over initial status compared to imbalanced application of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imbalanced fertilizer yielded less crop than balanced fertilizer with FYM.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
imbalanced inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
balanced dose of inorganic fertilizers with FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous use of imbalanced inorganic fertilizers resulted in lesser crop yields and nutrient uptake compared to that with the application of balanced dose of inorganic fertilizers with FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imbalanced fertilizer produced less nutrient uptake than balanced fertilizer with FYM.

Taxon
Maize–WheatTriticum aestivumZea mayst0
Treatment
imbalanced inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
balanced dose of inorganic fertilizers with FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous use of imbalanced inorganic fertilizers resulted in lesser crop yields and nutrient uptake compared to that with the application of balanced dose of inorganic fertilizers with FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize–Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.