Paper · 2020 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Maize Grain Quality as Influenced by 46 Years’ Continuous Application of Fertilizers, Farmyard Manure (FYM), and Lime in an Alfisol of North-western Himalayas

Anjali Thakur; R. P. Sharma; N. K. Sankhyan; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An understanding of maize nutritional quality response to fertilization is important to counter the widespread nutritional deficiencies among humans; however, little work has been done in this context. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous application of fertilizers, FYM, and lime on the quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India. The experiment consisted of 10 treatments and one control in three replications in a randomized block design. Results revealed that 100% NPK+FYM and 100% NPK+lime recorded 48% and 37% higher maize grain yield than 100% NPK, respectively. The highest starch (67.09%), reducing (1.13%), and non-reducing sugar content (0.59%) were recorded in 100% NPK+FYM and lowest in control. The omission of sulfur and potassium (100% NPK (-S) and 100% NP, respectively) recorded significantly lower crude protein, fat, and fiber content compared to the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphorus. The grain calcium and zinc content were recorded highest in 100% NPK+lime and 100% NPK+Zn, respectively, whereas phosphorus, magnesium, and iron content in 100% NPK+FYM and lowest in control. From the study, it can be concluded that higher crop yield and better nutritional quality can be achieved with a balanced application of NPK fertilizers along with FYM and lime.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+FYM treatment gave 48% higher maize grain yield than 100% NPK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% NPK+FYMe1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
48%e1
Comparator
100% NPKe1
Setting
acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% NPK+FYM and 100% NPK+lime recorded 48% and 37% higher maize grain yield than 100% NPK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+lime treatment gave 37% higher maize grain yield than 100% NPK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% NPK+limee1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
37%e1
Comparator
100% NPKe1
Setting
acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% NPK+FYM and 100% NPK+lime recorded 48% and 37% higher maize grain yield than 100% NPK, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+FYM treatment gave the highest maize grain starch content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% NPK+FYMe2
Outcome
starche2
Direction
higheste2
Value
67.09%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest starch (67.09%), reducing (1.13%), and non-reducing sugar content (0.59%) were recorded in 100% NPK+FYM and lowest in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+FYM treatment gave the highest maize grain reducing sugar content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% NPK+FYMe2
Outcome
reducinge2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1.13%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest starch (67.09%), reducing (1.13%), and non-reducing sugar content (0.59%) were recorded in 100% NPK+FYM and lowest in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+FYM treatment gave the highest maize grain non-reducing sugar content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% NPK+FYMe2
Outcome
non-reducing sugar contente2
Direction
higheste2
Value
0.59%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest starch (67.09%), reducing (1.13%), and non-reducing sugar content (0.59%) were recorded in 100% NPK+FYM and lowest in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting sulfur and potassium significantly lowered maize grain crude protein, fat and fiber content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
The omission of sulfur and potassiume3
Outcome
crude protein, fat, and fiber contente3
Direction
lowere3
Qualifier
100% NPK (-S) and 100% NP, respectivelye3
Comparator
the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphoruse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e3

“The omission of sulfur and potassium (100% NPK (-S) and 100% NP, respectively) recorded significantly lower crude protein, fat, and fiber content compared to the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+lime treatment gave the highest maize grain calcium content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
graine4
Treatment
100% NPK+limee4
Outcome
grain calciume4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain calcium and zinc content were recorded highest in 100% NPK+lime and 100% NPK+Zn, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+Zn treatment gave the highest maize grain zinc content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
graine4
Treatment
100% NPK+Zne4
Outcome
zinc contente4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain calcium and zinc content were recorded highest in 100% NPK+lime and 100% NPK+Zn, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK+FYM treatment gave higher maize grain phosphorus, magnesium and iron content than control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% NPK+FYMe5
Outcome
phosphorus, magnesium, and iron contente5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas phosphorus, magnesium, and iron content in 100% NPK+FYM and lowest in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1243 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A balanced application of NPK fertilizers with FYM and lime is recommended to achieve higher crop yield and better nutritional quality.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
balanced application of NPK fertilizers along with FYM and limee6
Outcome
higher crop yield and better nutritional qualitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
e6

“higher crop yield and better nutritional quality can be achieved with a balanced application of NPK fertilizers along with FYM and lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1421 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

85 papers: 71 positive, 14 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

potassium · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.