Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omitting sulfur and potassium significantly lowered maize grain crude protein, fat and fiber content.

A claim from Maize Grain Quality as Influenced by 46 Years’ Continuous Application of Fertilizers, Farmyard Manure (FYM), and Lime in an Alfisol of North-western Himalayas · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting sulfur and potassium significantly lowered maize grain crude protein, fat and fiber content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
The omission of sulfur and potassiume3
Outcome
crude protein, fat, and fiber contente3
Direction
lowere3
Qualifier
100% NPK (-S) and 100% NP, respectivelye3
Comparator
the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphoruse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a 46-year long-term experiment in an acid Alfisol of Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425
e3

“The omission of sulfur and potassium (100% NPK (-S) and 100% NP, respectively) recorded significantly lower crude protein, fat, and fiber content compared to the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1051

Title

Maize Grain Quality as Influenced by 46 Years’ Continuous Application of Fertilizers, Farmyard Manure (FYM), and Lime in an Alfisol of North-western Himalayas

Anjali Thakur; R. P. Sharma; N. K. Sankhyan; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2020. doi:10.1080/00103624.2020.1854289

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-09dfd499265f23de59de4a93fb5d72fba75868b0c289b4ecfc3b3d233c0e0380 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

potassium · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.