Paper · 2016 · Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches

Effect of sulphur and silicon application on the yield and chemical composition of maize grown under saline soil conditions

AbdElMotelb Khalifa; Magda Hussein; Mahmoud Gomaa

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out at the Experimental Research Station (Abis), Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, during the growth season of 2013/2014 to investigate the effect of sulfur and silicon applications on the yield and chemical composition of Maize (Zea mays L.)plant grownunder saline soil conditions. The seed individual hybrid 352 cultivar was used in this study. Two factors were conducted in a split-plot design with three replications. The elemental sulphur was applied to the main plots before planting at rates of 0, 200, 400 and 600 kg S/ fed. The sub- plot contained silicon treatments which were added before planting at rates of 0, 5, 10 and 15 kg Si/fed as potassium silicate. The highest grain yield of maize (1.472 ton/fed) was obtained due to application of 600 kg S/fed. Applied potassium silicate in combination with sulphur levels increased the grain yield in comparison with the control. Nitrogen, P, K, S and Si contents in leaves of maize were significantly increased as sulphur rates increased. Also, silicon application increased N, P, K, S and Si contents in leaves of maize at harvest as compared to the control. Nitrogen concentration and protein content in the grains of maize significantly increased as sulphur or silicon rate increased. Also, the application of sulphur or silicon and their interaction had significant increase effect on the amount of available S and available Si in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest maize grain yield was 1.472 ton/fed with 600 kg S/fed.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
600 kg S/fede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.472 ton/fede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of maize (1.472 ton/fed) was obtained due to application of 600 kg S/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate combined with sulphur increased maize grain yield versus control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
potassium silicate in combination with sulphur levelse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied potassium silicate in combination with sulphur levels increased the grain yield in comparison with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield and chemical composition of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur rates significantly increased maize leaf nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
sulphur ratese0
Outcome
Nitrogen, P, Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen, P, K, S and Si contents in leaves of maize were significantly increased as sulphur rates increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur rates significantly increased maize leaf sulphur and silicon content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
sulphur ratese0
Outcome
S and Si contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen, P, K, S and Si contents in leaves of maize were significantly increased as sulphur rates increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application increased maize leaf nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content at harvest versus control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
silicon applicatione0
Outcome
N, P, Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silicon application increased N, P, K, S and Si contents in leaves of maize at harvest as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application increased maize leaf sulphur and silicon content at harvest versus control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
silicon applicatione0
Outcome
S and Si contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silicon application increased N, P, K, S and Si contents in leaves of maize at harvest as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur or silicon rates significantly increased grain nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
sulphur or silicon ratee0
Outcome
Nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentration and protein content in the grains of maize significantly increased as sulphur or silicon rate increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur or silicon rates significantly increased maize grain protein content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
sulphur or silicon ratee0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentration and protein content in the grains of maize significantly increased as sulphur or silicon rate increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur or silicon application and their interaction significantly increased available soil sulphur and silicon.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
application of sulphur or silicon and their interactione0
Outcome
available S and available Si in soile0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of sulphur or silicon and their interaction had significant increase effect on the amount of available S and available Si in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1453 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield and chemical composition of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–282 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Omitting sulfur and potassium significantly lowered maize grain crude protein, fat and fiber content.

    Maize Grain Quality as Influenced by 46 Years’ Continuous Application of Fertilizers, Farmyard Manure (FYM), and Lime in an Alfisol of North-western Himalayas · 2020 · compared with the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphorus

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

silicate(4-) · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 41 positive, 3 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

silicon atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect

290 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

316 papers more in this group

See all 320 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.