Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Sulfur Application Improves the Nutritional Quality of Maize by Regulating the Amino Acid Balance of Grains

Honglin Wang; Shuai Cui; Jianan Fu; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

As a crucial staple crop in agricultural production, maize is extensively cultivated worldwide and plays a pivotal role in ensuring global food security. However, the significant deficiency of essential amino acids (EAA) and conditionally essential amino acids (CEAA), such as lysine (Lys), tryptophan (Trp), methionine (Met), and cysteine (Cys), leads to an imbalance of amino acids in the grain. This study investigates the regulatory mechanism of sulfur (S) application for regulating the amino acid balance of maize grains. The results demonstrate that S application has substantial effects on both the maize yield and nutritional quality. The S application resulted in an increase in maize yield by simultaneously enhancing the grain number per ear (GN) and 100-grain weight (GW), while S application elevated protein concentration through the augmentation of Cys concentration in maize grains. Furthermore, the Cys in grains optimizes the amino acid balance by regulating the ratio of other amino acids, thereby enhancing the nutritional quality of maize while ensuring a steady increase in protein concentration, simultaneously. Overall, the S application at 60–90 kg ha−1 synergistically improved both the yield and nutritional quality of maize, meeting the requirements for sustainable development in maize production. The findings offer a novel theoretical foundation and nutrient management approach for achieving high-yield and superior-quality maize production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The S application resulted in an increase in maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application enhanced maize grain number per ear.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S application resulted in an increase in maize yield by simultaneously enhancing the grain number per ear (GN) and 100-grain weight (GW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application enhanced maize 100-grain weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
100-grain weighte0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S application resulted in an increase in maize yield by simultaneously enhancing the grain number per ear (GN) and 100-grain weight (GW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application raised grain protein concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S application elevated protein concentration through the augmentation of Cys concentration in maize grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application raised grain cysteine concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S applicatione0
Outcome
Cys concentratione0
Direction
augmentatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S application elevated protein concentration through the augmentation of Cys concentration in maize grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–899 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute improved amino acid balance and nutritional quality to grain cysteine regulating other amino acid ratios.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
Cyse0
Outcome
amino acid balancee0
Qualifier
regulating the ratio of other amino acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Cys in grains optimizes the amino acid balance by regulating the ratio of other amino acids, thereby enhancing the nutritional quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report that 60–90 kg ha−1 sulfur jointly improved maize yield and nutritional quality.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S application at 60–90 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
yield and nutritional qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the S application at 60–90 kg ha−1 synergistically improved both the yield and nutritional quality of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1252 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Omitting sulfur and potassium significantly lowered maize grain crude protein, fat and fiber content.

    Maize Grain Quality as Influenced by 46 Years’ Continuous Application of Fertilizers, Farmyard Manure (FYM), and Lime in an Alfisol of North-western Himalayas · 2020 · compared with the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphorus

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.