Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur did not affect harvest moisture content in 2006 and 2007.

A claim from Is Sulfur Limiting Maize Grown on Eroded Midwestern U.S. Soils · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur did not affect harvest moisture content in 2006 and 2007.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
Se1
Outcome
moisture content at harveste1
Direction
not affectede1
Qualifier
2006 and 2007e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–61
e1

“Grain yield and moisture content at harvest were not affected by S in 2006 and 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–743

Title

Is Sulfur Limiting Maize Grown on Eroded Midwestern U.S. Soils

John L. Kovar; D. L. Karlen 2010

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-8e5fcaabe9ff8a4f2ce83bec4749c146d473543cff06d7c14e4e8a8e4719f912 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.