Paper · 2026 · Plant Breeding

Development and Application of a 3D‐Printed Germination Plate: A Simple Tool for Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Precision Phenotyping and Breeding

Gabriela Breccia; Mónica Morata; Fernando Reartes; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wheat is the most important cereal worldwide. Germination assays are widely employed to assess seed quality and evaluate the response of diverse genotypes to abiotic stresses. Advancements in 3D printing technology enable the production of customized germination supports. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a 3D‐printed plate for seed germination by assessing its effectiveness for the screening of drought tolerance and herbicide resistance in different wheat genotypes. Germination experiments were conducted with different concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or imazethapyr herbicide. The 3D‐printed plate improves wheat seed germination when compared to the traditional paper‐based method. PEG treatment significantly reduced ( p < 0.05) shoot length in all genotypes, with two mutant lines displaying higher tolerance to 15% PEG than the wild type. In the herbicide assay, shoot length, green area and root length were significantly inhibited under increased concentrations of imazethapyr, exhibiting genotype‐dependent responses. The 3D‐printed plate proved to be a valuable tool for drought tolerance characterization using PEG and enabled the identification of wheat genotypes with varying levels of resistance to the imazethapyr herbicide. The germination plate developed in this study offers potential for evaluating a broad spectrum of abiotic stresses in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3D-printed plate improved wheat germination compared with paper.

Outcome
wheat seed germinatione0
Direction
improvese0
Comparator
traditional paper‐based methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 3D‐printed plate improves wheat seed germination when compared to the traditional paper‐based method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG significantly reduced wheat shoot length across genotypes.

Treatment
PEG treatmente0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
all genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PEG treatment significantly reduced ( p < 0.05) shoot length in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two mutant wheat lines tolerated 15% PEG better than wild type.

Material
two mutant linese0
Treatment
15% PEGe0
Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two mutant lines displaying higher tolerance to 15% PEG than the wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing imazethapyr concentrations significantly inhibited wheat shoot length, green area and root length with genotype-dependent responses.

Treatment
increased concentrations of imazethapyre0
Outcome
shoot length, green area and root lengthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
genotype‐dependent responsese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot length, green area and root length were significantly inhibited under increased concentrations of imazethapyr, exhibiting genotype‐dependent responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plate enabled characterization of wheat drought tolerance using PEG.

Outcome
drought tolerance characterizatione0
Value
PEGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 3D‐printed plate proved to be a valuable tool for drought tolerance characterization using PEG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plate identified wheat genotypes with differing resistance to imazethapyr.

Outcome
identification of wheat genotypes with varying levels of resistancee0
Value
imazethapyr herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enabled the identification of wheat genotypes with varying levels of resistance to the imazethapyr herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1286 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 6 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Imazethapyr · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.