Paper · 2026 · Biomass and Bioenergy

Açaí biochar reduced soil acidity and enhanced potassium and micronutrient availability in Amazon Ferralsol under cowpea cultivation

Criscian Kellen Amaro de Oliveira Danielli; Antonio Leite Florentino; Filipe Eduardo Danielli; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil acidity and aluminium toxicity are major constraints to crop productivity in tropical regions. Although liming effectively increases soil pH and enhances nutrient availability, its high cost limits adoption by smallholder farmers, especially in the Amazon region. Biochar has emerged as a sustainable alternative. However, its effectiveness depends on pyrolysis conditions and interactions with soil properties. This study evaluated the effects of açaí biochar ( Euterpe oleracea Mart.), applied alone or in combination with reduced lime rates, on the chemical properties of a clayey Ferralsol and on nutrient uptake and biomass production in cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). Two experiments—soil incubation and greenhouse trials—were conducted in a completely randomized design with a 5 × 5 factorial arrangement. Treatments consisted of five biochar rates (0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 Mg ha −1 ) and five lime rates (ranging from 100% to 0% of the recommended dose to achieve 60% base saturation). A 40 Mg ha −1 biochar application increased soil pH by 0.52 units, reduced exchangeable Al by up to 53%, and enhanced plant K accumulation by 55%, even without lime. Intermediate to high biochar rates combined with 25–50% lime improved the availability of key nutrients, particularly K, B, Cu, and Zn. Although shoot biomass showed limited response, Cu and Zn uptake increased with biochar application. Açaí biochar, applied alone or with reduced lime, is a promising amendment to improve soil fertility and micronutrient uptake, thereby contributing to more sustainable crop production in low-fertility tropical soils. • Açaí biochar increased soil pH and reduced exchangeable Al in Ferralsol. • Biochar plus 25–50% lime enhanced soil K, B, Zn, and Cu availability. • Biochar increased K and micronutrient uptake, especially Cu and Zn. • Açaí biochar is a viable alternative to reduce lime use in tropical soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40 Mg ha −1 biochar application increased soil pH by 0.52 units.

Treatment
40 Mg ha −1 biochar applicatione1
Outcome
soil pHe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.52 unitse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 40 Mg ha −1 biochar application increased soil pH by 0.52 units”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40 Mg ha −1 biochar application reduced exchangeable soil Al by up to 53%.

Treatment
40 Mg ha −1 biochar applicatione1
Outcome
exchangeable Ale1
Direction
reducede1
Value
up to 53%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 40 Mg ha −1 biochar application increased soil pH by 0.52 units, reduced exchangeable Al by up to 53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40 Mg ha −1 biochar application enhanced plant K accumulation by 55% without lime.

Treatment
40 Mg ha −1 biochar applicatione1
Outcome
plant K accumulatione1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
55%e1
Qualifier
even without limee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 40 Mg ha −1 biochar application increased soil pH by 0.52 units, reduced exchangeable Al by up to 53%, and enhanced plant K accumulation by 55%, even without lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate to high biochar with 25–50% lime improved soil K, B and Cu availability.

Treatment
biochar rates combined with 25–50% limee1
Outcome
availability of key nutrients, particularly K, B, Cue1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intermediate to high biochar rates combined with 25–50% lime improved the availability of key nutrients, particularly K, B, Cu, and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate to high biochar with 25–50% lime improved soil Zn availability.

Treatment
biochar rates combined with 25–50% limee1
Outcome
Zne1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intermediate to high biochar rates combined with 25–50% lime improved the availability of key nutrients, particularly K, B, Cu, and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea shoot biomass showed limited response to biochar.

Treatment
biochar applicatione1
Outcome
shoot biomasse1
Direction
limited responsee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although shoot biomass showed limited response, Cu and Zn uptake increased with biochar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased cowpea Cu and Zn uptake.

Treatment
biochar applicatione1
Outcome
Cu and Zn uptakee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu and Zn uptake increased with biochar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1406 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose açaí biochar with reduced lime to improve fertility and uptake.

Outcome
Açaí biochar, applied alone or with reduced limee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Açaí biochar, applied alone or with reduced lime, is a promising amendment to improve soil fertility and micronutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1533 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑

biochar · soil: chemistry · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

biochar · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.