Paper · 2026 · Industrial Crops and Products

Salt stress-induced alterations of photosynthesis and growth are associated with microRNA-mediated transcriptome regulatory networks in cotton

Muhammad Saqib Bilal; Necati ÇETİN; Hamza Tariq; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Despite advances in genetic engineering for cotton improvement, salt stress severely impacts cotton productivity. Photosynthesis is critical for cotton yield, but this decline is often exacerbated by the growth-defence trade-off under salt stress. Therefore, exploring semi-wild cotton relatives is a promising approach to understand such a trade-off. Here, we examined the growth-defence dilemma in semi-wild cotton genotypes by integrating multi-omics and machine learning (ML)-assisted phenotyping. The ML-assisted physiological screening distinguished 204 as a salt-sensitive genotype and TM-1 as a salt-tolerant genotype, based on leaf gas exchange, biomass production, and whole-plant responses to salt stress. The integrated microRNA-transcriptomics analysis indicated that TM-1 exhibited significant enriched miRNAs and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the transcriptional regulation of photosynthesis and carbon fixation, whereas 204 showed a more generalised response to salt stress. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) identified three core modules associated with photosynthetic traits, with enriched hub genes in the Calvin cycle ( RUBISCO , FBPase , PGK ) and redox homeostasis ( POD , CYP450 ). Notably, the downregulation of ghr-miR156b, ghr-miR160, ghr-miR164, and ghr-miR166b in TM-1 was consistent with the upregulation of their target genes. However, 204 showed less coordinated regulation with reduced expression of growth-related genes under salt stress. In agreement with these findings, both TM-1 and 204 showed higher antioxidant activities under salt stress, except for the activation of photosynthetic enzymes, which was higher in TM-1 only. Our study indicates a putative regulatory module of hub genes and miRNAs for biotechnological optimisation by potentially reducing growth-defence trade-offs in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TM-1 was classed as a salt-tolerant cotton genotype.

Material
TM-1e0
Outcome
salt-tolerant genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ML-assisted physiological screening distinguished 204 as a salt-sensitive genotype and TM-1 as a salt-tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

204 was classed as a salt-sensitive cotton genotype.

Material
204e0
Outcome
salt-sensitive genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ML-assisted physiological screening distinguished 204 as a salt-sensitive genotype and TM-1 as a salt-tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TM-1 showed significantly enriched miRNAs and DEGs in the transcriptional regulation of photosynthesis and carbon fixation.

Material
TM-1e1
Outcome
transcriptional regulation of photosynthesis and carbon fixatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“TM-1 exhibited significant enriched miRNAs and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the transcriptional regulation of photosynthesis and carbon fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

204 showed a more generalised response to salt stress.

Material
204e2
Outcome
generalised response to salt stresse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“204 showed a more generalised response to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1000 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three core WGCNA modules were associated with photosynthetic traits in cotton.

Gene
RUBISCOe4
Outcome
photosynthetic traitse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e3

“identified three core modules associated with photosynthetic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1122 · show in text ↑
e4

“enriched hub genes in the Calvin cycle ( RUBISCO , FBPase , PGK ) and redox homeostasis ( POD , CYP450 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hub genes RUBISCO, FBPase and PGK were enriched in the Calvin cycle in cotton.

Gene
RUBISCO, FBPase, PGKe4
Outcome
enriched hub genes in the Calvin cyclee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e4

“enriched hub genes in the Calvin cycle ( RUBISCO , FBPase , PGK ) and redox homeostasis ( POD , CYP450 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hub genes POD and CYP450 were enriched in redox homeostasis in cotton.

Gene
POD, CYP450e4
Outcome
redox homeostasise4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e4

“enriched hub genes in the Calvin cycle ( RUBISCO , FBPase , PGK ) and redox homeostasis ( POD , CYP450 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In TM-1 the miRNAs ghr-miR156b, ghr-miR160, ghr-miR164 and ghr-miR166b were downregulated, consistent with upregulation of their target genes.

Material
TM-1e6
Gene
ghr-miR156b, ghr-miR160, ghr-miR164, and ghr-miR166be6
Outcome
target genese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e6

“the downregulation of ghr-miR156b, ghr-miR160, ghr-miR164, and ghr-miR166b in TM-1 was consistent with the upregulation of their target genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

204 showed reduced expression of growth-related genes under salt stress.

Material
204e7
Treatment
salt stresse7
Outcome
expression of growth-related genese7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e7

“204 showed less coordinated regulation with reduced expression of growth-related genes under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TM-1 had higher antioxidant activities under salt stress.

Material
TM-1e7
Treatment
salt stresse7
Outcome
antioxidant activitiese7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e7

“both TM-1 and 204 showed higher antioxidant activities under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

204 had higher antioxidant activities under salt stress.

Material
204e7
Treatment
salt stresse7
Outcome
antioxidant activitiese7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e7

“both TM-1 and 204 showed higher antioxidant activities under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activation of photosynthetic enzymes was higher in TM-1 than in 204 under salt stress.

Material
TM-1e7
Treatment
salt stresse6
Outcome
activation of photosynthetic enzymese7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
204e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
e6

“both TM-1 and 204 showed higher antioxidant activities under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1608 · show in text ↑
e7

“except for the activation of photosynthetic enzymes, which was higher in TM-1 only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1692 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

26 papers: 4 positive, 22 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 6 positive, 13 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

salinity · molecular: expression · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 11 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.