Paper · 2026 · Environmental Toxicology

Phytotoxic Responses of Agricultural Crops to Nickel–Cobalt–Manganese Exposure During Early Growth Under Neutral and Acidified Conditions

Freddy Brandon Torres Rojas; Wenting Liu; Youbao Wang

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rapid expansion of nickel–cobalt–manganese (NCM) battery production has raised concerns regarding mixed‐metal contamination in agricultural ecosystems, particularly in regions lacking effective end‐of‐life battery management. Such contamination may promote uncontrolled metal release and pose phytotoxic risks during early crop establishment. Unlike single‐metal exposure, this represents a complex mixed‐metal stressor whose combined biological effects and modulation by chemical conditions remain insufficiently understood. Here, we investigated early plant responses using four widely cultivated crops—maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )—under non‐acidified and acid‐amended conditions. Two experimental regimes were applied: a non‐acidified gradient (0–500 mg·L −1 ) and an acid‐amended scenario simulating battery‐derived leachates (200–1000 mg·L −1 ). Across species, germination processes were relatively resilient to metal exposure, whereas post‐germination traits—including root and shoot growth, root–shoot allocation, photosynthetic pigment stability, antioxidant responses, and biomass accumulation—were more sensitive and exhibited clear inhibitory responses. Acidification transiently enhanced early performance at low stress levels but markedly amplified phytotoxic effects at higher concentrations, indicating a limited capacity for physiological adjustment under increasing exposure. Plant responses were strongly species‐specific, with wheat showing the highest tolerance, maize intermediate plasticity, and canola and Chinese cabbage greater sensitivity. Overall, phytotoxicity was chemically mediated, concentration‐dependent, and species‐specific, with root‐related traits representing critical bottlenecks for early crop performance under mixed‐metal exposure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination was relatively resilient to metal exposure across the four crops.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )Brassica napusTriticum aestivumZea maysBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise1
Treatment
metal exposuree0
Outcome
germination processese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across species, germination processes were relatively resilient to metal exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1048 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-germination growth, allocation, pigments, antioxidants and biomass were inhibited by metal exposure.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )Brassica napusTriticum aestivumZea maysBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise1
Outcome
root and shoot growth, root–shoot allocation, photosynthetic pigment stability, antioxidant responses, and biomass accumulatione0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post‐germination traits—including root and shoot growth, root–shoot allocation, photosynthetic pigment stability, antioxidant responses, and biomass accumulation—were more sensitive and exhibited clear inhibitory responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidification enhanced early performance at low stress levels.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )Brassica napusTriticum aestivumZea maysBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise1
Treatment
Acidificatione0
Outcome
early performancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
low stress levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acidification transiently enhanced early performance at low stress levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidification amplified phytotoxicity at higher concentrations.

Taxon
maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )Brassica napusTriticum aestivumZea maysBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise1
Treatment
Acidificatione0
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0
Direction
amplifiede0
Qualifier
higher concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acidification transiently enhanced early performance at low stress levels but markedly amplified phytotoxic effects at higher concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize ( Zea mays ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), and Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat showed the highest tolerance.

Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat showing the highest tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1598 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize showed intermediate plasticity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
plasticitye0
Direction
intermediatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize intermediate plasticity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1629 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola and Chinese cabbage showed greater sensitivity.

Outcome
sensitivitye0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola and Chinese cabbage greater sensitivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1681 · show in text ↑

ph · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ph · crop injury · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.