Paper · 2026 · Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

Efficient in vitro Micropropagation of Hemp (Cannabis sativa) genotype

Cennet Yaman; Güngör Yılmaz; Talip Koçer

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, an effective regeneration and micropropagation protocol was developed from segregating the F4 industrial hemp genotype Narlısaray. The apical shoot meristem and nodal (from different parts of the plant) explants were cultured at various concentrations of TDZ, BAP or Kin. Shoot regeneration was observed in all treatments, including the control treatment. The maximum number of shoots per explant (4.7) was obtained at 1.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ, and was statistically different from 0.5 mg l⁻¹ (4.3) and 2.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ (4.0). The longest shoots (6.5 cm) were recorded on 1.0 mg l-1 TDZ. The position of the nodal explant source on the plant also affected its regeneration ability. The 1st stem node explant was more responsive to in vitro regeneration than the 2nd stem node. All tested concentrations of IBA induced root regeneration, with frequencies ranging from 62.5% to 87.5%. The regenerated plants were successfully acclimatized, reaching a maximum survival rate of 66.7%. This propagation technique can contribute to future hemp rapid breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp shoot regeneration occurred in all treatments, including control.

Outcome
Shoot regeneratione0
Qualifier
all treatments, including the control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hemp (Cannabis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shoot regeneration was observed in all treatments, including the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TDZ at 1.0 mg l⁻¹ gave the maximum 4.7 shoots per explant, significantly different from the 0.5 and 2.0 mg l⁻¹ doses.

Treatment
1.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZe0
Outcome
number of shoots per explante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.7e0
Qualifier
2.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ (4.0)e0
Comparator
0.5 mg l⁻¹e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hemp (Cannabis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum number of shoots per explant (4.7) was obtained at 1.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ, and was statistically different from 0.5 mg l⁻¹ (4.3) and 2.0 mg l⁻¹ TDZ (4.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TDZ at 1.0 mg l-1 produced the longest shoots, 6.5 cm.

Treatment
1.0 mg l-1 TDZe0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
longeste0
Value
6.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hemp (Cannabis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The longest shoots (6.5 cm) were recorded on 1.0 mg l-1 TDZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First stem node explants regenerated more responsively than second stem node explants.

Material
1st stem node explante0
Outcome
in vitro regeneratione0
Direction
more responsivee0
Comparator
2nd stem nodee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hemp (Cannabis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The 1st stem node explant was more responsive to in vitro regeneration than the 2nd stem node”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested IBA concentrations induced root regeneration at frequencies from 62.5% to 87.5%.

Treatment
All tested concentrations of IBAe0
Outcome
root regeneratione0
Direction
inducede0
Value
62.5% to 87.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hemp (Cannabis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“All tested concentrations of IBA induced root regeneration, with frequencies ranging from 62.5% to 87.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–884 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerated hemp plants acclimatized successfully, reaching maximum survival of 66.7%.

Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
66.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hemp (Cannabis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The regenerated plants were successfully acclimatized, reaching a maximum survival rate of 66.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–982 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Thidiazuron · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.