Paper · 2026 · BMC Plant Biology

MGIDI-based ideotype selection and genetic variation for wheat agronomic traits and bread-making quality (BMQ) under drought stress condition

Maryam Karegar; Mahbobeh Fazaeli; Tawfiq Mazal-Mazraei; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Enhancing flour quality is key to bread wheat marketability. It requires evaluating agronomic traits, bread-making quality (BMQ), and baking parameters to develop high-yielding varieties. This study assessed genetic variation and the effects of drought stress on these traits in a core collection of wheat cultivars, landraces, and lines. Field experiments used a split-plot design with three replications over two seasons under well-irrigated (WI) and drought-stress (DS) regimes (irrigation ceased at flowering). Genotype-by-irrigation interactions revealed significant genetic heterogeneity under water-limited conditions. Trait ranges varied with regime: the gluten index (GI) and grain hardness (GH) were broader under WI, while protein content, Zeleny sedimentation value (ZSV), water absorption, and dough development time were broader under DS. Drought increased tensile strength, protein content, and dough stability, indicating inconsistent trait responses. Genotype and genotype-by-environment (GGE) biplot analysis revealed that drought-stressed environments (E2, E4) were most discriminating for grain yield (GY) and GI. Several genotypes (Shiraz for GY; Satin for GI) showed close association with E2 and E4 environments, indicating adaptation to drought. A desirability index combining mean performance and stability identified Shiraz (GY) and Satin (GI) as superior for GY and GI, respectively. However, no single genotype consistently excelled across all traits, confirming trait-specific adaptation. Genetic coefficient of variation was higher for BMQ than agronomic traits in both regimes. Heritability was high for ZSV (> 0.90), GI (> 0.80), and spikelet number per spike (> 0.70) across regimes but inconsistent for other traits. Canonical correlation analysis identified two significant pairs, linking ZSV and GH indirectly with yield components. The multi-Trait Genotype-Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI)-based selection identified top performers (Danesh, Line 181, Shiraz). It also quantified irrigation-dependent outcomes: drought drove gains in GI (+ 60.0%) and yield traits but increased GH (+ 16.1%). In contrast, WI favored yield with reduced GH (-8.7%). These findings highlight MGIDI's utility in resolving trait trade-offs for environment-specific breeding. The GGE biplot models effectively visualized mega-environment differentiation and genotype stability, providing a complementary framework to MGIDI for selecting wheat varieties with both drought resilience and BMQ. Results reveal inconsistent interrelationships between agronomic and BMQ traits, notably a yield-quality trade-off (GH, GI) under contrasting irrigation regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by irrigation interactions showed significant genetic heterogeneity.

Treatment
water-limited conditionse0
Outcome
genetic heterogeneitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype-by-irrigation interactions revealed significant genetic heterogeneity under water-limited conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten index and grain hardness ranges were broader with full irrigation.

Treatment
WIe0
Outcome
gluten index (GI) and grain hardness (GH)e0
Direction
broadere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the gluten index (GI) and grain hardness (GH) were broader under WI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content, Zeleny sedimentation, water absorption and dough development ranges were broader under drought.

Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
protein content, Zeleny sedimentation value (ZSV)e0
Direction
broadere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content, Zeleny sedimentation value (ZSV), water absorption, and dough development time were broader under DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased tensile strength, protein content and dough stability.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
tensile strength, protein content, and dough stabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought increased tensile strength, protein content, and dough stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought environments E2 and E4 best discriminated grain yield and gluten index.

Outcome
grain yield (GY) and GIe0
Direction
most discriminatinge0
Value
E2, E4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-stressed environments (E2, E4) were most discriminating for grain yield (GY) and GI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shiraz associated with drought environments for yield and Satin for gluten index.

Material
Shiraze0
Outcome
GYe0
Setting
E2 and E4 environmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Several genotypes (Shiraz for GY; Satin for GI) showed close association with E2 and E4 environments, indicating adaptation to drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shiraz ranked superior for yield by the desirability index.

Material
Shiraze0
Outcome
GYe0
Value
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A desirability index combining mean performance and stability identified Shiraz (GY) and Satin (GI) as superior for GY and GI, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No genotype excelled consistently across all traits.

Outcome
no single genotype consistently excelled across all traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no single genotype consistently excelled across all traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bread making quality had higher genetic coefficient of variation than agronomic traits.

Outcome
Genetic coefficient of variatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
agronomic traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic coefficient of variation was higher for BMQ than agronomic traits in both regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeleny sedimentation heritability exceeded 0.90.

Outcome
Heritabilitye0
Value
> 0.90e0
Qualifier
ZSVe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heritability was high for ZSV (> 0.90), GI (> 0.80), and spikelet number per spike (> 0.70) across regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten index heritability exceeded 0.80.

Outcome
Heritabilitye0
Value
> 0.80e0
Qualifier
GIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heritability was high for ZSV (> 0.90), GI (> 0.80), and spikelet number per spike (> 0.70) across regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spikelet number heritability exceeded 0.70.

Outcome
Heritabilitye0
Value
> 0.70e0
Qualifier
spikelet number per spikee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heritability was high for ZSV (> 0.90), GI (> 0.80), and spikelet number per spike (> 0.70) across regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two canonical correlation pairs linked sedimentation and hardness indirectly with yield components.

Outcome
yield componentse0
Value
two significant pairse0
Comparator
ZSV and GHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canonical correlation analysis identified two significant pairs, linking ZSV and GH indirectly with yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGIDI selected Danesh, Line 181 and Shiraz.

Outcome
top performerse0
Value
Danesh, Line 181, Shiraze0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multi-Trait Genotype-Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI)-based selection identified top performers (Danesh, Line 181, Shiraz).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1995 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought selection increased gluten index by 60.0%.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
GIe0
Direction
gainse0
Value
+ 60.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought drove gains in GI (+ 60.0%) and yield traits but increased GH (+ 16.1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2046–2126 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased grain hardness by 16.1%.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
GHe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+ 16.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought drove gains in GI (+ 60.0%) and yield traits but increased GH (+ 16.1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2046–2126 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation favored yield and reduced grain hardness by 8.7%.

Treatment
WIe0
Outcome
GHe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
-8.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI favored yield with reduced GH (-8.7%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2181 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GGE biplots visualized mega-environment differentiation and genotype stability.

Outcome
mega-environment differentiation and genotype stabilitye0
Value
effectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GGE biplot models effectively visualized mega-environment differentiation and genotype stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2288–2388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic and bread quality traits showed a yield-quality tradeoff under contrasting irrigation.

Treatment
contrasting irrigation regimese0
Outcome
yield-quality trade-offe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results reveal inconsistent interrelationships between agronomic and BMQ traits, notably a yield-quality trade-off (GH, GI) under contrasting irrigation regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2503–2664 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

60 papers: 32 positive, 28 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

drought · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.