Paper · 2025 · Plant Cell & Environment

Drought‐Induced Adaptive Intergenerational Plasticity Boosts Grain Yield in Winter Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

Baoru Li; Jie Han; Huijie Gu; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Intergenerational plasticity namely parental environmental induction of offspring phenotypic changes, offers a promising pathway for drought adaptation, but the induction mechanisms and adaptive mechanisms are insufficient. To address this, we integrated multi-season soil pot and field experiments with multi-omics analyses to systematically evaluate the intergenerational plasticity of winter wheat. Results showed that parental drought applied during jointing (gametogenesis) significantly augmented offspring grain yield by 33% under severe drought in soil pot, whereas post-anthesis drought failed to enhance offspring yield (-5%, p > 0.05), when compared to the common irrigation regime. Among nine cultivars tested, only JM22, China's most widely cultivated cultivar, exhibited synergistic physiological improvements and the strongest adaptive intergenerational plasticity, increasing grain yield by 10.5% under field drought conditions. JM22's offspring from drought-primed parents showed enhanced assimilate transport, delayed leaf senescence, improved root plasticity, and higher water-use efficiency. Remarkably, two consecutive generations of drought exposure further amplified this yield benefit to 15.2%. Genome-wide DNA hypomethylation and transcriptomic reprogramming underpinned this enhanced resilience. Our study reveals that adaptive intergenerational plasticity in wheat is driven by a finely-tuned resource re-allocation strategy that balances drought defense with reproductive growth, a process consolidated over generations through epigenetic mechanisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jointing-stage parental drought increased offspring grain yield 33% under severe pot drought versus common irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
parental drought applied during jointing (gametogenesis)e0
Outcome
offspring grain yielde0
Direction
augmentede0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
common irrigation regimee0
Setting
soil pote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“parental drought applied during jointing (gametogenesis) significantly augmented offspring grain yield by 33% under severe drought in soil pot, whereas post-anthesis drought failed to enhance offspring yield (-5%, p > 0.05), when compared to the common irrigation regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis parental drought did not significantly improve offspring yield, with a reported -5% difference.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
post-anthesis droughte0
Outcome
offspring yielde0
Direction
failed to enhancee0
Value
-5%e0
Comparator
common irrigation regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-anthesis drought failed to enhance offspring yield (-5%, p > 0.05), when compared to the common irrigation regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among nine tested cultivars, JM22 showed the strongest adaptive intergenerational response and 10.5% greater yield under field drought.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
JM22e0
Treatment
field drought conditionse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
10.5%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among nine cultivars tested, only JM22, China's most widely cultivated cultivar, exhibited synergistic physiological improvements and the strongest adaptive intergenerational plasticity, increasing grain yield by 10.5% under field drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM22 offspring from drought-primed parents had enhanced assimilate transport.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
JM22e0
Treatment
drought-primed parentse0
Outcome
assimilate transporte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JM22's offspring from drought-primed parents showed enhanced assimilate transport, delayed leaf senescence, improved root plasticity, and higher water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM22 offspring from drought-primed parents had delayed leaf senescence.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
JM22e0
Treatment
drought-primed parentse0
Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JM22's offspring from drought-primed parents showed enhanced assimilate transport, delayed leaf senescence, improved root plasticity, and higher water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM22 offspring from drought-primed parents had improved root plasticity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
JM22e0
Treatment
drought-primed parentse0
Outcome
root plasticitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JM22's offspring from drought-primed parents showed enhanced assimilate transport, delayed leaf senescence, improved root plasticity, and higher water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM22 offspring from drought-primed parents had higher water-use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
JM22e0
Treatment
drought-primed parentse0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JM22's offspring from drought-primed parents showed enhanced assimilate transport, delayed leaf senescence, improved root plasticity, and higher water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two successive generations of drought exposure increased the yield benefit to 15.2%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two consecutive generations of drought exposuree0
Outcome
yield benefite0
Direction
amplifiede0
Value
15.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two consecutive generations of drought exposure further amplified this yield benefit to 15.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute enhanced resilience to genome-wide DNA hypomethylation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
enhanced resiliencee0
Qualifier
Genome-wide DNA hypomethylatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genome-wide DNA hypomethylation and transcriptomic reprogramming underpinned this enhanced resilience.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute enhanced resilience to transcriptomic reprogramming.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
enhanced resiliencee0
Qualifier
transcriptomic reprogramminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genome-wide DNA hypomethylation and transcriptomic reprogramming underpinned this enhanced resilience.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose resource reallocation between drought defense and reproduction as a driver of adaptive plasticity.

Outcome
adaptive intergenerational plasticitye0
Qualifier
resource re-allocation strategy that balances drought defense with reproductive growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adaptive intergenerational plasticity in wheat is driven by a finely-tuned resource re-allocation strategy that balances drought defense with reproductive growth, a process consolidated over generations through epigenetic mechanisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1578 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 537 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.