Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of Drought at the Post-anthesis Stage on Remobilization of Carbon Reserves and Some Physiological Changes in the Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars Differing in Drought Resistance

Saeed Saeedipour; Foad Moradi

17
claims
40
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Remobilization and transfer of the stored food in vegetative tissues to the grains in monocarpic plants require the initiation of whole plant senescence. However, mechanisms by which plant senescence promotes remobilization of assimilates are rather obscure. This study examined the relationship between the senescence induced by water deficits and C remobilization during grain filling. Two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.), Marvdasht and Zagros (sensitive and tolerant to terminal season drought, respectively) grown at a day: night temperature of 22:15°C from anthesis were held as well watered controls (Field Capacity), or subject to water deficit (50% FC) imposed either from anthesis to 14 days later (WS1) or from 14 days after anthesis to maturity (WS2). Relative water content, photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll content, soluble proteins of flag leaves, level of hexose sugars, sucrose and fructans in the peduncle (enclosed by the flag leaf sheath) and the penultimate internode and grain yield assessed. Results showed that water deficits enhanced the senescence by accelerating loss of leaf chlorophyll and soluble proteins and the loss was more under WS2 than WS1. The net CO2 assimilation rate (PN) in flag leaves during water deficit display a strict correlation with the drought sensitivity of the genotypes and showed an early reduction in Marvdasht. Water stress, both at WS1 and WS2, facilitated the reduction in concentration of total soluble sugars and fructans in the internodes but increased the sucrose level there, promoted the re-allocation of pre-stored C from the peduncle and penultimate to grains. There was an increase in internodes fructose and a fall in fructan level that preceded the loss of dry matter associated with water stress. WS2 resulted in more deleterious effect on grain yield than WS1 in both cultivars and led to a smaller kernels and lesser aerial biomass at maturity. The loss was more in Marvdasht than Zagros. Our results suggest that the senescence and remobilization promoted by water deficits during grain filling are coupled processes in wheat, and mass of soluble sugars in the stems is premier than sugar remobilization efficiency. Varietal differences in the extent of such trait existed. It would be advantageous to select genotypes with greater capacity to do this under water deficit conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits enhanced senescence of wheat flag leaves compared with well watered controls.

Treatment
water deficitse3
Outcome
senescencee3
Direction
enhancede3
Comparator
well watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“held as well watered controls (Field Capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–629 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficits enhanced the senescence by accelerating loss of leaf chlorophyll and soluble proteins and the loss was more under WS2 than WS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits accelerated the loss of leaf chlorophyll and soluble proteins in wheat flag leaves.

Treatment
water deficitse3
Outcome
loss of leaf chlorophyll and soluble proteinse3
Direction
acceleratinge3
Comparator
well watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“held as well watered controls (Field Capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–629 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficits enhanced the senescence by accelerating loss of leaf chlorophyll and soluble proteins and the loss was more under WS2 than WS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The loss in wheat flag leaves was greater under WS2 than under WS1.

Treatment
WS2e3
Outcome
losse3
Direction
moree3
Comparator
WS1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e3

“water deficits enhanced the senescence by accelerating loss of leaf chlorophyll and soluble proteins and the loss was more under WS2 than WS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1186 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net CO2 assimilation rate of flag leaves under water deficit correlated strictly with drought sensitivity of the genotypes.

Treatment
water deficite4
Outcome
net CO2 assimilation rate (PN) in flag leavese4
Qualifier
strict correlation with the drought sensitivity of the genotypese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e4

“The net CO2 assimilation rate (PN) in flag leaves during water deficit display a strict correlation with the drought sensitivity of the genotypes and showed an early reduction in Marvdasht”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1376 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net CO2 assimilation rate of flag leaves was reduced early in the drought-sensitive cultivar Marvdasht.

Material
Marvdashte4
Outcome
net CO2 assimilation rate (PN) in flag leavese4
Direction
reductione4
Qualifier
earlye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e4

“The net CO2 assimilation rate (PN) in flag leaves during water deficit display a strict correlation with the drought sensitivity of the genotypes and showed an early reduction in Marvdasht”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced concentrations of total soluble sugars and fructans in internodes.

Organ / stage
internodese5
Treatment
Water stresse5
Outcome
concentration of total soluble sugars and fructanse5
Direction
reductione5
Comparator
well watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“held as well watered controls (Field Capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–629 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water stress, both at WS1 and WS2, facilitated the reduction in concentration of total soluble sugars and fructans in the internodes but increased the sucrose level there”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased sucrose level in internodes.

Organ / stage
internodese5
Treatment
Water stresse5
Outcome
sucrose levele5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
well watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“held as well watered controls (Field Capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–629 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water stress, both at WS1 and WS2, facilitated the reduction in concentration of total soluble sugars and fructans in the internodes but increased the sucrose level there”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased fructose in internodes of wheat.

Organ / stage
internodese6
Treatment
water stresse6
Outcome
internodes fructosee6
Direction
increasee6
Comparator
well watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“held as well watered controls (Field Capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–629 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was an increase in internodes fructose and a fall in fructan level that preceded the loss of dry matter associated with water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress lowered the fructan level in wheat, preceding the loss of dry matter.

Treatment
water stresse6
Outcome
fructan levele6
Direction
falle6
Qualifier
preceded the loss of dry matter associated with water stresse6
Comparator
well watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“held as well watered controls (Field Capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–629 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was an increase in internodes fructose and a fall in fructan level that preceded the loss of dry matter associated with water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WS2 had a more deleterious effect on grain yield than WS1 in both cultivars.

Treatment
WS2e7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
more deleteriouse7
Comparator
WS1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e7

“WS2 resulted in more deleterious effect on grain yield than WS1 in both cultivars and led to a smaller kernels and lesser aerial biomass at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WS2 led to smaller kernels than WS1.

Treatment
WS2e7
Outcome
kernelse7
Direction
smallere7
Comparator
WS1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e7

“WS2 resulted in more deleterious effect on grain yield than WS1 in both cultivars and led to a smaller kernels and lesser aerial biomass at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WS2 led to lower aerial biomass at maturity than WS1.

Organ / stage
maturitye7
Treatment
WS2e7
Outcome
aerial biomasse7
Direction
lessere7
Comparator
WS1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e7

“WS2 resulted in more deleterious effect on grain yield than WS1 in both cultivars and led to a smaller kernels and lesser aerial biomass at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1926 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The loss under water deficit was greater in Marvdasht than in Zagros.

Material
Marvdashte0
Outcome
losse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Zagrose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“The loss was more in Marvdasht than Zagros”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–1970 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senescence and remobilization promoted by water deficits during grain filling are coupled processes in wheat.

Treatment
water deficitse0
Outcome
senescence and remobilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“the senescence and remobilization promoted by water deficits during grain filling are coupled processes in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2109 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mass of soluble sugars in the stems is more important than sugar remobilization efficiency.

Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
mass of soluble sugars in the stemse0
Direction
premiere0
Comparator
sugar remobilization efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“mass of soluble sugars in the stems is premier than sugar remobilization efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2115–2198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat varieties differed in the extent of the trait for sugar remobilization under water deficit.

Outcome
extent of such traite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“Varietal differences in the extent of such trait existed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2200–2256 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting genotypes with greater capacity for sugar remobilization under water deficit would be advantageous.

Outcome
select genotypes with greater capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“It would be advantageous to select genotypes with greater capacity to do this under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2258–2366 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.