Paper · 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Growth, Yield and Nodulation Response of Green Beans (phaseolus vulgaris l.) to Different Indigenous Microorganism Fertilizer Concentrations in Bambili, Cameroon

Muyang Rosaline Fosah; Ache Neh Teke; Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait; et al.

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a leguminous plant consumed worldwide with the capacity of fixing atmospheric nitrogen by forming a symbiotic relationship with nitrogen fixing bacteria (Rhizobia) in their root nodules. This study was carried out to determine the optimal concentration of indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer for maximum productivity and its effect on formation of root nodules in Bambili village. An experimental farm was set up, laid out in a complete randomized design using four treatments (0g being the control, 5g, 10g and 15g of IMO) with four replications. Fertilizers were applied 5 days before planting and repeated every 2 weeks up to 8 weeks after planting (WAP). Growth parameters were measured every 2 weeks. The data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine specific differences between group pairs. Plants grown with IMO did better in terms of growth and yield as compared to the control. Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 for number of leaves (47.31 ± 4.347), number of branches (14.25 ± 2.145), plant height (90.719 ± 0148.154), number of pods (29,81±12.608) weight of pods (0.903±0.303) and number of root nodules (79.18±15.633). These results suggest that 15 g of IMO per plant is suitable for green bean cultivation. Farmers should prioritize the use of IMO to grow crops as it can substitute for chemical fertilizers which are not environmentally friendly. More research should be carried out using higher doses of IMO to know the optimal concentration of IMO that can be used for the cultivation of green beans and other crops. Keywords: Green beans, IMO, fertilizer, Yield, Nodulation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IMO improved green bean growth and yield relative to the control.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme2other
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown with IMO did better in terms of growth and yield as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1000 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best leaf number, 47.31 ± 4.347, with significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
15 g of IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme2other
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
beste0
Value
47.31 ± 4.347e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 for number of leaves (47.31 ± 4.347)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best branch number, 14.25 ± 2.145, with significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
15 g of IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme2other
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
beste0
Value
14.25 ± 2.145e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 for number of leaves (47.31 ± 4.347), number of branches (14.25 ± 2.145)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best plant height, 90.719 ± 0148.154, with significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
15 g of IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme3other
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
beste0
Value
90.719 ± 0148.154e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height (90.719 ± 0148.154)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best pod number, 29,81±12.608, with significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
15 g of IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme3other
Outcome
number of podse1
Direction
beste0
Value
29,81±12.608e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of pods (29,81±12.608)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best pod weight, 0.903±0.303, with significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
15 g of IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme3other
Outcome
weight of podse1
Direction
beste0
Value
0.903±0.303e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“weight of pods (0.903±0.303)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1264 · show in text ↑
e2

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best root nodule number, 79.18±15.633, with significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
15 g of IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme3other
Outcome
number of root nodulese1
Direction
beste0
Value
79.18±15.633e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of root nodules (79.18±15.633)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1306 · show in text ↑
e2

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider 15 g IMO per plant suitable for green bean cultivation.

Taxon
green beane0
Outcome
15 g of IMO per plante0

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that 15 g of IMO per plant is suitable for green bean cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1396 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend prioritizing IMO as a substitute for chemical fertilizers.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
prioritize the use of IMO to grow cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Farmers should prioritize the use of IMO to grow crops as it can substitute for chemical fertilizers which are not environmentally friendly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend investigating higher IMO doses to determine optimal concentrations for green beans and other crops.

Taxon
green beanse0
Outcome
research should be carried out using higher doses of IMOe0

Verbatim

e0

“More research should be carried out using higher doses of IMO to know the optimal concentration of IMO that can be used for the cultivation of green beans and other crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1709 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.