Intervention effectmodel-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best leaf number, 47.31 ± 4.347, with significant treatment differences.

A claim from Growth, Yield and Nodulation Response of Green Beans (phaseolus vulgaris l.) to Different Indigenous Microorganism Fertilizer Concentrations in Bambili, Cameroon · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 g IMO produced the best leaf number, 47.31 ± 4.347, with significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
15 g of IMOe0
Interactor
indigenous microorganisme2other
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
beste0
Value
47.31 ± 4.347e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with 15 g of IMO produced the best results which were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 for number of leaves (47.31 ± 4.347)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1134
e1

“Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43
e2

“indigenous microorganism (IMO) fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–344

Title

Growth, Yield and Nodulation Response of Green Beans (phaseolus vulgaris l.) to Different Indigenous Microorganism Fertilizer Concentrations in Bambili, Cameroon

Muyang Rosaline Fosah; Ache Neh Teke; Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20583184

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-eee7f8cd2a522f2181f7cae9f1c727455b0c416593ee28f6c7c6a3b958da3e1c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

117 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.