Paper · 2026 · Sustainability

Compound Microbial Strains and Humic Acid Improve Physicochemical Properties of Salinized Soil and Physiological Characteristics of Oil Sunflower: An Experimental Investigation

Hefang Jing; Xuhui Meng; Lixin Zhang; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil salinization commonly prevails in global arid and semi-arid areas, shrinking farmland and endangering ecological, agricultural and social sustainability. Therefore, it is essential to develop effective strategies for salinized soil remediation. In this study, soil samples were collected from Nanliang Farm in Yinchuan, China. Compound microbial strains (CMS) and humic acid (HA) were selected as soil amendments. A total of eight treatments with different application rates of CMS and HA were set up in pot cultivation experiments, where oil sunflower was planted. The results showed that both amendments effectively elevated soil water content and chlorophyll content, as well as multiple physiological indices of sunflower. Meanwhile, they decreased soil total salinity, proline content and malondialdehyde (MDA) content. For single humic acid treatments, Treatment F1 achieved the optimal amelioration effect: it reduced soil total salinity by an average of 24.34%, and increased sunflower plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight by 5.84%, 95.01% and 77.40%, respectively. Among the single CMS treatments, Treatment S3 performed best, with an average reduction of 31.04% in soil total salinity, and increases of 5.66%, 2.85% and 8.16% in plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight correspondingly. Notably, among all eight groups, the control group CK1 exhibited the most prominent improvement effect, which was significantly superior to F1 and S3. This finding suggests that long-term application (one year or more) of CMS can produce an especially strong ameliorative effect on salinized soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both amendments increased soil water and sunflower chlorophyll content and physiological indices.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
both amendmentse0
Outcome
soil water content and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both amendments effectively elevated soil water content and chlorophyll content, as well as multiple physiological indices of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both amendments decreased soil salinity, proline, and malondialdehyde content.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Treatment
theye0
Outcome
soil total salinity, proline content and malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“they decreased soil total salinity, proline content and malondialdehyde (MDA) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid treatment F1 reduced soil total salinity by 24.34%.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Treatment
Treatment F1e0
Outcome
soil total salinitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment F1 achieved the optimal amelioration effect: it reduced soil total salinity by an average of 24.34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 increased sunflower plant height by 5.84%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.84%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased sunflower plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight by 5.84%, 95.01% and 77.40%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 increased sunflower leaf area by 95.01%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
95.01%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased sunflower plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight by 5.84%, 95.01% and 77.40%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 increased sunflower aboveground fresh weight by 77.40%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
aboveground fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
77.40%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased sunflower plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight by 5.84%, 95.01% and 77.40%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMS treatment S3 reduced soil salinity by 31.04%.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Treatment
Treatment S3e0
Outcome
soil total salinitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
31.04%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment S3 performed best, with an average reduction of 31.04% in soil total salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3 increased sunflower height by 5.66%.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
5.66%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increases of 5.66%, 2.85% and 8.16% in plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight correspondingly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3 increased sunflower leaf area by 2.85%.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.85%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increases of 5.66%, 2.85% and 8.16% in plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight correspondingly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3 increased sunflower aboveground fresh weight by 8.16%.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Outcome
aboveground fresh weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
8.16%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increases of 5.66%, 2.85% and 8.16% in plant height, leaf area and aboveground fresh weight correspondingly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The control CK1 had the strongest improvement, significantly exceeding F1 and S3.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Outcome
improvement effecte0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
F1 and S3e0

Not reportedMaterial

Verbatim

e0

“the control group CK1 exhibited the most prominent improvement effect, which was significantly superior to F1 and S3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest CMS application for at least one year can strongly ameliorate salinized soil.

Taxon
Oil Sunflowert0
Treatment
long-term application (one year or more) of CMSe0
Outcome
ameliorative effect on salinized soile0

Verbatim

e0

“long-term application (one year or more) of CMS can produce an especially strong ameliorative effect on salinized soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–145 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: pigments · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.