Paper · 2026 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Preharvest supplemental lighting enhances productivity and modulates postharvest quality in hydroponically grown Apulian unripe melon ‘Scopatizzo’ ( Cucumis melo L.)

Onofrio Davide Palmitessa; Marica Troilo; Carlo Porfido; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preharvest light management is increasingly used to enhance yield and fruit quality in soilless systems, yet its effects on unripe melon fruits remain poorly understood. This study evaluated the impact of supplemental red-blue light-emitting diode (LED) lighting applied during cultivation in a closed-cycle hydroponic system on productivity, mineral composition and postharvest behaviour (4 °C for up to 17 days) of the Apulian melon landrace 'Scopatizzo' (Cucumis melo L.), consumed as an unripe fruit alternative to cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). RESULTS: Principal component analysis highlighted a clear separation between cucumber and 'Scopatizzo' samples. In 'Scopatizzo', LED supplementation increased fruit number per plant by approximately 29% (14 versus 11 fruits per plant) without affecting fruit mineral composition at harvest. During cold storage, LED-grown fruits maintained approximately 18% higher firmness at the end of storage than control fruits. Variations in moisture content, pH and titratable acidity were mainly driven by storage time and were unaffected by the light regime. LED-grown fruits showed up to 12% higher chlorophyll and 28% higher glucose concentrations at harvest than controls, whereas total phenolics and carotenoids increased during storage in both treatments (+80% and +22%, respectively), indicating a predominant effect of cold-induced metabolic responses during postharvest. CONCLUSION: Preharvest LED lighting enhanced productivity and improved specific postharvest quality traits of 'Scopatizzo' without altering its mineral profile, supporting the integration of light management and soilless cultivation to valorise melon landraces and extend their marketability as fresh, whole-edible products. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA separated cucumber and Scopatizzo samples.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Material
Scopatizzoe0
Outcome
clear separation between cucumber and 'Scopatizzo' samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal component analysis highlighted a clear separation between cucumber and 'Scopatizzo' samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED supplementation increased fruit number per plant by about 29%, from 11 to 14.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
LED supplementatione0
Outcome
fruit number per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approximately 29%e0
Qualifier
14 versus 11 fruits per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LED supplementation increased fruit number per plant by approximately 29% (14 versus 11 fruits per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED supplementation did not affect fruit mineral composition at harvest.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
LED supplementatione1
Outcome
fruit mineral composition at harveste0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without affecting fruit mineral composition at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“LED supplementation increased fruit number per plant by approximately 29% (14 versus 11 fruits per plant) without affecting fruit mineral composition at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED-grown fruits retained about 18% greater firmness at the end of cold storage.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
LED-growne0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
highere0
Value
approximately 18%e0
Qualifier
at the end of storagee0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LED-grown fruits maintained approximately 18% higher firmness at the end of storage than control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture, pH and acidity varied mainly with storage time and were unaffected by light regime.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
moisture content, pH and titratable aciditye0
Setting
storage timee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variations in moisture content, pH and titratable acidity were mainly driven by storage time and were unaffected by the light regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED-grown fruit had up to 12% higher chlorophyll at harvest.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
LED-growne0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
up to 12%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LED-grown fruits showed up to 12% higher chlorophyll and 28% higher glucose concentrations at harvest than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED-grown fruit had 28% higher glucose at harvest.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
LED-growne0
Outcome
glucose concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LED-grown fruits showed up to 12% higher chlorophyll and 28% higher glucose concentrations at harvest than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolics increased 80% during storage in both treatments.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
total phenolicse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+80%e0
Qualifier
during storage in both treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolics and carotenoids increased during storage in both treatments (+80% and +22%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoids increased 22% during storage in both treatments.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+22%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolics and carotenoids increased during storage in both treatments (+80% and +22%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: pigments · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.