Paper · 2026 · Environmental Pollutants and Bioavailability

Characteristics of cadmium accumulation in tobacco under field conditions and their enhancement strategies

Ziang Guo; Yuhao Zhi; Chenzi Ma; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tobacco, with its substantial biomass and strong cadmium (Cd) enrichment capacity, is a potential candidate for phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil. However, its Cd accumulation characteristics under field conditions remain unclear. In this study, a field experiment (soil Cd concentration: 0.9 mg·kg⁻¹) demonstrated that the Cd accumulation per tobacco plant reached 1148.1 μg, with a dry biomass of 432.2 g in the mowing treatment. Cd was detected in all parts of the tobacco plant, with the highest concentration found in the leaf mesophyll (7.0 mg·kg⁻¹), and the predominant Cd chemical form was the less toxic NaCl-extractable fraction, which may be associated with the plant's Cd detoxification mechanism. Additionally, the Cd concentration was higher in the lateral roots than in the main roots, higher in the stem phloem than in the xylem, and a certain amount of Cd was also present in the flowers. Compared to 60 d after transplanting, the Cd concentrations in leaves, stems and roots, as well as the total and available Cd concentrations in rhizosphere soil, were significantly reduced at 180 d after transplanting. This decline may be attributed to Cd depletion in the rhizosphere soil and dilution effects caused by rapid plant growth. Nevertheless, the total Cd accumulation per plant at 180 d was significantly higher than that at 60 d. Mowing measures increased leaf dry biomass by 1.6 times, consequently enhancing total Cd accumulation by 1.6 times. These results provide a theoretical foundation for the practical application of tobacco in remediating Cd-contaminated soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowed tobacco accumulated 1148.1 μg Cd per plant and had 432.2 g dry biomass.

Treatment
mowing treatmente0
Outcome
Cd accumulation per tobacco plante0
Value
1148.1 μge0
Qualifier
432.2 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Cd accumulation per tobacco plant reached 1148.1 μg, with a dry biomass of 432.2 g in the mowing treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowed tobacco had dry biomass of 432.2 g.

Treatment
mowing treatmente0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Value
432.2 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Cd accumulation per tobacco plant reached 1148.1 μg, with a dry biomass of 432.2 g in the mowing treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium was detected in all tobacco parts.

Outcome
Cd was detected in all partse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd was detected in all parts of the tobacco plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf mesophyll had the highest cadmium concentration, 7.0 mg·kg⁻¹.

Organ / stage
leaf mesophylle0
Outcome
highest concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.0 mg·kg⁻¹e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest concentration found in the leaf mesophyll (7.0 mg·kg⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The predominant cadmium form was the less toxic NaCl-extractable fraction.

Outcome
predominant Cd chemical forme0
Qualifier
less toxic NaCl-extractable fractione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the predominant Cd chemical form was the less toxic NaCl-extractable fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium concentration was higher in lateral roots than main roots.

Organ / stage
lateral rootse0
Outcome
Cd concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
main rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Cd concentration was higher in the lateral roots than in the main roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium concentration was higher in stem phloem than xylem.

Organ / stage
stem phloeme0
Outcome
Cd concentratione1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
xyleme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher in the stem phloem than in the xylem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Cd concentration was higher in the lateral roots than in the main roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium was also present in flowers.

Organ / stage
flowerse0
Outcome
Cd was also presente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a certain amount of Cd was also present in the flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf, stem and root cadmium concentrations were significantly lower at 180 than 60 days after transplanting.

Outcome
Cd concentrations in leaves, stems and rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
180 d after transplantinge0
Comparator
60 d after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 60 d after transplanting, the Cd concentrations in leaves, stems and roots, as well as the total and available Cd concentrations in rhizosphere soil, were significantly reduced at 180 d after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total and available rhizosphere soil cadmium concentrations were significantly lower at 180 than 60 days.

Outcome
total and available Cd concentrations in rhizosphere soile0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
180 d after transplantinge0
Comparator
60 d after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 60 d after transplanting, the Cd concentrations in leaves, stems and roots, as well as the total and available Cd concentrations in rhizosphere soil, were significantly reduced at 180 d after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total cadmium per plant was significantly higher at 180 than 60 days after transplanting.

Outcome
total Cd accumulation per plante0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
180 de0
Comparator
60 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total Cd accumulation per plant at 180 d was significantly higher than that at 60 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing increased leaf dry biomass 1.6 times.

Treatment
Mowing measurese0
Outcome
leaf dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.6 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mowing measures increased leaf dry biomass by 1.6 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing enhanced total cadmium accumulation 1.6 times.

Treatment
Mowing measurese0
Outcome
total Cd accumulatione0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
1.6 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mowing measures increased leaf dry biomass by 1.6 times, consequently enhancing total Cd accumulation by 1.6 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑

pruning · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pruning · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.