Paper · 2014 · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)

Quantification of plant-available potassium (K) in a corn-soybean rotation: A long-term evaluation of K rates and crop K removal effects

Ronald Jose Navarrete-Ganchozo

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A long-term field study conducted at five Purdue Agricultural Centers located in west-central, north-central, south-eastern, north-eastern, and east-central Indiana was designed to assess the soil's ability to supply potassium (K) in a corn (Zea mays L.) – soybean (Glycine max Merr.) rotation, and to evaluate the assumptions in the current soil K fertilizer recommendation. The objectives of this study were to 1) evaluate the long-term impact of five K rates, application frequency (annual or biennial), soil depth, and the soil K budget (net K addition/removal) on soil exchangeable K (Kexch) levels; 2) to quantify the effects of K application frequency and K rates on grain yields, and evaluate currently established Kexch critical levels for corn and soybean; and 3) to evaluate the long-term effect of K fertilization rates, net K addition/K removal, and residual K fertilizer on subsoil Kexch. Soil sampling during the growing season (0-20 cm) was synchronized to immediately precede the rapid K accumulation that corresponds to greatest growth rates. Post-harvest sampling was performed with a hydraulic soil probe to obtain intact cores to a depth of 60+ cm. Grain yield and grain K concentrations were measured to calculate crop K removal rates at harvest. Soil Kexch increases with net K additions varied across sites, in which differences were not related to differences in soil cation exchange capacity as indicated in the current recommendation. Within each site, the rate of Kexch decrease (as a function of the soil K budget) in soils with net K removal was smaller in magnitude than the increase observed in soils per unit net K addition. Additionally, annual K additions proved more effective in building-up soil Kexch than biennial applications. However, yield differences across application frequencies were not observed. Yield response to K additions was not observed in soils with Kexch considered limiting according to the recommendation framework. Non-linear models suggested that lower than currently-recommended Kexch levels can be risked at the 0-10 and 0-20 cm depths without significantly affecting grain yields. However, analysis of yield as a function of Kexch could not clearly identify a critical level or range in soil Kexch levels, irrespective of location or soil depth increment. Potassium fertilizer applied remained in the upper 20 cm of the soil profile. Subsoil Kexch depletion was observed at all sites, which resulted from crop K removal exceeding K rates additions. However, for near-maximum net K removals between 700-450 kg ha-1, long-term subsoil K exch declines at the 20-30 cm depth layer were less or equal than ≤16 mg kg-1 across sites. Consequently, the often reported lack of topsoil Kexch change in soils with large net K removals could not be attributed to subsoil Kexch dynamics or cycling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil exchangeable K increased with net additions, varying across sites.

Treatment
net K additionse0
Outcome
Soil Kexche0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
varied across sitese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil Kexch increases with net K additions varied across sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1330 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Site differences in the K response were unrelated to cation exchange capacity.

Outcome
differencese0
Setting
soil cation exchange capacitye0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“differences were not related to differences in soil cation exchange capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1417 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K decline with net removal was smaller than K gain per unit net addition.

Treatment
net K removale0
Outcome
rate of Kexch decreasee0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
increase observed in soils per unit net K additione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“rate of Kexch decrease (as a function of the soil K budget) in soils with net K removal was smaller in magnitude than the increase observed in soils per unit net K addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual K additions built soil exchangeable K more effectively than biennial applications.

Treatment
annual K additionse0
Outcome
soil Kexche0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
biennial applicationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“annual K additions proved more effective in building-up soil Kexch than biennial applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not differ across K application frequencies.

Treatment
application frequenciese0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield differences across application frequencies were not observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not respond to K additions even in soils classified as K limiting.

Treatment
K additionse0
Outcome
Yield responsee0
Direction
not observede0
Qualifier
soils with Kexch considered limitinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield response to K additions was not observed in soils with Kexch considered limiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1930 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Models suggested lower recommended K thresholds could be used without significant grain yield loss.

Outcome
grain yieldse0
Qualifier
0-10 and 0-20 cm depthse0
Comparator
currently-recommended Kexch levelse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Non-linear models suggested that lower than currently-recommended Kexch levels can be risked at the 0-10 and 0-20 cm depths without significantly affecting grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2142 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield analysis could not identify a clear critical soil K range.

Outcome
critical level or range in soil Kexch levelse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“analysis of yield as a function of Kexch could not clearly identify a critical level or range in soil Kexch levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2267 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied K remained in the top 20 cm of soil.

Outcome
Potassium fertilizer applied remainede0
Value
20 cme0

Not reportedTaxonOrgan / stage

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertilizer applied remained in the upper 20 cm of the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2319–2395 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil exchangeable K depleted at all sites.

Outcome
Subsoil Kexch depletione0
Setting
all sitese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Subsoil Kexch depletion was observed at all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2397–2446 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop K removal exceeded added K rates.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
K rates additionse0
Outcome
crop K removale0
Direction
exceedinge0

Verbatim

e0

“crop K removal exceeding K rates additions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2468–2510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term subsoil K decline at 20-30 cm was at most 16 mg kg-1 under large net removals.

Outcome
long-term subsoil K exch declinese0
Direction
declinese0
Value
≤16 mg kg-1e0
Qualifier
near-maximum net K removals between 700-450 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“near-maximum net K removals between 700-450 kg ha-1, long-term subsoil K exch declines at the 20-30 cm depth layer were less or equal than ≤16 mg kg-1 across sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2525–2688 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of topsoil K change under large removals could not be attributed to subsoil K cycling.

Outcome
lack of topsoil Kexch changee0
Qualifier
subsoil Kexch dynamics or cyclinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“lack of topsoil Kexch change in soils with large net K removals could not be attributed to subsoil Kexch dynamics or cycling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2723–2847 · show in text ↑