Paper · 1989 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Phosphorus fractions, movement and fertilizer requirements of grapes grown on White House soil.

Mohamad Mussaddak. Janat

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A two-year fertilizer study on a mature vineyard of Vita vinifera, C. V. Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon blanc, has been conducted on White House sandy loam (fine, mixed, thermic Ustollic Haplargid), at Page Ranch, International Agricultural Center. Furthermore, eleven different varieties grown at Page Ranch and treated with different levels of nitrogen fertilizer were tested for total P content in plant tissue and NO₃-N. Moreover, in another site with similar soil, a Cabernet Sauvignon grown at the Vina Sonoita Vineyard was treated with both soil and foliar applications of P fertilizer, and was tested for total P content in plant tissue. Soil phosphorus (P) fractions of the White House soil were determined in order to evaluate the various forms of soil P and determine the most important form which contributes most to the availability index. The objectives of this study were to study the various inorganic P forms of White House soil, compare two methods of extracting available P (Olsen and Bray P.), and examine the relationships between soil pH, extractable Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn with the availability index of soil P. Furthermore, the effect of P rates and placement on the P status of plant tissue, grape yield, wine quality and petiole-P to blade-P ratio had been investigated. Three different placements of surface, 25 and 50 cm depth at rates of 88 g of P and 80 g of N per vine, were in RCB design in 1987. In 1988, three P rates of 0, 88, and 176 g of P and 207.5 g N per vine, and the two mentioned varieties CS and SB were arranged in RCB design with factorial type. The results showed that placements did not have a significant effect of P status in plant tissue and grape yield. Yet grapes showed a significant response to P fertilizer in terms of increasing P content in plant tissues and grape yield. Petiole P to Blade P ratios were calculated for the CS, and SB grown at Page Ranch, as well as for CS grown at Sonoita vineyard. This ratio is a good indicator for diagnosis of P status in a given vineyard. Nitrogen stress had its clear and profound effect on P content of grape petioles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus placement did not significantly affect plant tissue P status.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
placementse0
Outcome
P status in plant tissuee0
Direction
did not have a significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“placements did not have a significant effect of P status in plant tissue and grape yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus placement did not significantly affect grape yield.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
placementse0
Outcome
grape yielde0
Direction
did not have a significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“placements did not have a significant effect of P status in plant tissue and grape yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilizer increased P content in grape tissues.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
P fertilizere0
Outcome
P content in plant tissuese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes showed a significant response to P fertilizer in terms of increasing P content in plant tissues and grape yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilizer increased grape yield.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
P fertilizere0
Outcome
grape yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grapes showed a significant response to P fertilizer in terms of increasing P content in plant tissues and grape yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1827 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole to blade P ratio was reported as a useful vineyard P diagnostic.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
diagnosis of P statuse0
Comparator
This ratioe0

Verbatim

e0

“This ratio is a good indicator for diagnosis of P status in a given vineyard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2034 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen stress affected grape petiole P content.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Nitrogen stresse0
Outcome
P content of grape petiolese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen stress had its clear and profound effect on P content of grape petioles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2035–2116 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.