Abstract
A two-year fertilizer study on a mature vineyard of Vita vinifera, C. V. Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon blanc, has been conducted on White House sandy loam (fine, mixed, thermic Ustollic Haplargid), at Page Ranch, International Agricultural Center. Furthermore, eleven different varieties grown at Page Ranch and treated with different levels of nitrogen fertilizer were tested for total P content in plant tissue and NO₃-N. Moreover, in another site with similar soil, a Cabernet Sauvignon grown at the Vina Sonoita Vineyard was treated with both soil and foliar applications of P fertilizer, and was tested for total P content in plant tissue. Soil phosphorus (P) fractions of the White House soil were determined in order to evaluate the various forms of soil P and determine the most important form which contributes most to the availability index. The objectives of this study were to study the various inorganic P forms of White House soil, compare two methods of extracting available P (Olsen and Bray P.), and examine the relationships between soil pH, extractable Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn with the availability index of soil P. Furthermore, the effect of P rates and placement on the P status of plant tissue, grape yield, wine quality and petiole-P to blade-P ratio had been investigated. Three different placements of surface, 25 and 50 cm depth at rates of 88 g of P and 80 g of N per vine, were in RCB design in 1987. In 1988, three P rates of 0, 88, and 176 g of P and 207.5 g N per vine, and the two mentioned varieties CS and SB were arranged in RCB design with factorial type. The results showed that placements did not have a significant effect of P status in plant tissue and grape yield. Yet grapes showed a significant response to P fertilizer in terms of increasing P content in plant tissues and grape yield. Petiole P to Blade P ratios were calculated for the CS, and SB grown at Page Ranch, as well as for CS grown at Sonoita vineyard. This ratio is a good indicator for diagnosis of P status in a given vineyard. Nitrogen stress had its clear and profound effect on P content of grape petioles.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus placement did not significantly affect plant tissue P status.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Treatment
- placementse0
- Outcome
- P status in plant tissuee0
- Direction
- did not have a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“placements did not have a significant effect of P status in plant tissue and grape yield.”
t0“grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus placement did not significantly affect grape yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“placements did not have a significant effect of P status in plant tissue and grape yield.”
t0“grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilizer increased P content in grape tissues.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“grapes showed a significant response to P fertilizer in terms of increasing P content in plant tissues and grape yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilizer increased grape yield.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“grapes showed a significant response to P fertilizer in terms of increasing P content in plant tissues and grape yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Petiole to blade P ratio was reported as a useful vineyard P diagnostic.
Verbatim
e0“This ratio is a good indicator for diagnosis of P status in a given vineyard.”
t0“grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen stress affected grape petiole P content.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen stress had its clear and profound effect on P content of grape petioles.”
t0“grapes”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.