Paper · 2010

Comparison of florasulam+2,4-D application effect in wheat, barley and oat cultivated in monocrops and in two-species mixtures.

S. Kaczmarek; K. Adamczewski; Kinga Matysiak

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the herbicidal efficiency of mixture florasulam + 2,4-D (Mustang 306 SE) in spring wheat cultivar Bryza, spring barley cultivar Antek and oat cultivar Cwal sown in monocrops and two-species mixtures. Field experiments were carried out in 2005-2007 at the Experimental Station in Winna Gora (52 o 12' N; 17 o 27' E), owned by the Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute in Poznan. Herbicyd Mustang 306 SE was applied in a dose of 0.5 dm 3 ·ha -1 at 3-5 leaf stage of cereals using the knapsack sprayer Gloria. The analysis of weed infestation of cereal stand was made with the quantitative-weighing method twice in the growing period (3-4 weeks after the application and 7-8 weeks after the application). Efficiency of herbicide action in mixtures was compared with its effectiveness in monocrops of individual species. From the analyses made it follows that of the cereal mixtures, the barley-oat mixture was infested in the least degree, and the wheat-oat mixture in the most degree. Strongest effect of cultivation in mixtures on reduction of weed infestation was noticeable on the control treatments, where the herbicide was not applied, whereas the cereal cultivation system (pure or mixed sowing) not always differentiated the herbicide efficiency. Cereal grain yields in mixtures after the application of mixture florasulam + 2,4-D were significantly higher than yields of at least one of the component, and yields of mixtures harvested from the control treatments exceeded grain yields of both cereal species in monocrops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley-oat mixture had the lowest weed infestation among cereal mixtures.

Outcome
infestede0
Direction
least degreee0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the barley-oat mixture was infested in the least degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, barley and oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-oat mixture had the highest weed infestation among cereal mixtures.

Outcome
infestede1
Direction
most degreee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the wheat-oat mixture in the most degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“From the analyses made it follows that of the cereal mixtures, the barley-oat mixture was infested in the least degree, and the wheat-oat mixture in the most degree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cereal cultivation reduced weed infestation most strongly in untreated controls.

Treatment
cultivation in mixturese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strongest effect of cultivation in mixtures on reduction of weed infestation was noticeable on the control treatments, where the herbicide was not applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, barley and oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure versus mixed cereal sowing did not consistently differentiate herbicide efficiency.

Outcome
herbicide efficiencye0
Direction
not always differentiatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cereal cultivation system (pure or mixed sowing) not always differentiated the herbicide efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, barley and oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After florasulam plus 2,4-D, cereal mixture grain yields significantly exceeded at least one component crop.

Treatment
florasulam + 2,4-De0
Outcome
Cereal grain yields in mixturese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
at least one of the componente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cereal grain yields in mixtures after the application of mixture florasulam + 2,4-D were significantly higher than yields of at least one of the component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, barley and oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated cereal mixtures yielded more grain than both cereal monocrops.

Treatment
mixturese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
both cereal species in monocropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields of mixtures harvested from the control treatments exceeded grain yields of both cereal species in monocrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, barley and oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Florasulam · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.