Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in Tamil Nadu, India, during the 2002 and 2003 rabi seasons, to study the effect of different in situ soil moisture conservation and nutrient management practices on soil moisture conservation, growth, yield and economics of cowpea under rainfed conditions. Results showed that moisture conservation through ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulching recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields, nutrient uptake and net returns of cowpea. Significant grain yield of cowpea was obtained under ridges and furrows with mulching (715.9 kg/ha), and tied ridges with mulching (297.4 kg/ha) during 2002 and 2003, respectively. Enriched compost application had significant influence on growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields and nutrient uptake of cowpea. Enriched compost application during 2002 and integration of 50% inorganic fertilizers and 50% enriched compost during 2003 registered significantly higher grain yield (730.7 and 284.5 kg/ha) of cowpea over farmers' practice of no nutrient application, respectively
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges and furrows or tied ridges with mulching increased cowpea growth and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulchinge0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“moisture conservation through ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulching recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields, nutrient uptake and net returns of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Those moisture conservation practices increased grain and haulm yields.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulchinge0
- Outcome
- grain and haulm yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“moisture conservation through ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulching recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields, nutrient uptake and net returns of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Those moisture conservation practices increased cowpea nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulchinge0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“moisture conservation through ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulching recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields, nutrient uptake and net returns of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Those moisture conservation practices increased net returns.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulchinge0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“moisture conservation through ridges and furrows or tied ridges along with mulching recorded significantly higher growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields, nutrient uptake and net returns of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges and furrows with mulching gave 715.9 kg/ha grain yield in 2002.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- ridges and furrows with mulchinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 715.9 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2002e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant grain yield of cowpea was obtained under ridges and furrows with mulching (715.9 kg/ha), and tied ridges with mulching (297.4 kg/ha) during 2002 and 2003, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Tied ridges with mulching gave 297.4 kg/ha grain yield in 2003.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- tied ridges with mulchinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 297.4 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2003e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant grain yield of cowpea was obtained under ridges and furrows with mulching (715.9 kg/ha), and tied ridges with mulching (297.4 kg/ha) during 2002 and 2003, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched compost significantly affected cowpea growth and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Enriched compost applicatione0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Enriched compost application had significant influence on growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields and nutrient uptake of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched compost significantly affected cowpea grain and haulm yields.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Enriched compost applicatione0
- Outcome
- grain and haulm yieldse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Enriched compost application had significant influence on growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields and nutrient uptake of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched compost significantly affected cowpea nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Enriched compost applicatione0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Enriched compost application had significant influence on growth and yield attributes, grain and haulm yields and nutrient uptake of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched compost produced a significantly higher cowpea grain yield of 730.7 kg/ha than no nutrient application in 2002.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Enriched compost applicatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 730.7e0
- Qualifier
- 2002e0
- Comparator
- farmers' practice of no nutrient applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Enriched compost application during 2002 and integration of 50% inorganic fertilizers and 50% enriched compost during 2003 registered significantly higher grain yield (730.7 and 284.5 kg/ha) of cowpea over farmers' practice of no nutrient application, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
A 50% inorganic fertilizer and 50% enriched compost mix produced a significantly higher grain yield of 284.5 kg/ha than no nutrients in 2003.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- 50% inorganic fertilizers and 50% enriched composte0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 284.5 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2003e0
- Comparator
- farmers' practice of no nutrient applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“integration of 50% inorganic fertilizers and 50% enriched compost during 2003 registered significantly higher grain yield (730.7 and 284.5 kg/ha) of cowpea over farmers' practice of no nutrient application, respectively”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
288 papers more in this group
See all 292 papers →mulching · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
mulching · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.