Paper · 2009 · Zhongguo shucai

Effects of controlled-releasing bulk blending fertilizer application on garlic yield, quality and nitrogen utilization efficiency

Qi JianJian; Shiqi Liu; Zikun Zhang; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field-trail experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of single basal application of controlled-releasing bulk blending fertilizer(CRF)on yield,quality and nitrogen utilization efficiency of two garlic cultivars'Cangshansuan'and'Jinxiangsuan'.Results showed that compared to CCF,100 % and 80 % CRF treatments could increase bulb yield,bulb soluble sugar content and SOD activity significantly by 5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %,3.5 %-27.6 % and 15.1 %-30.0 %,48.1 %-93.2 % and 61.0 %-68.4 % for each cultivar,respectively.What was more,12.5 %-20.5 % and 31.8 %-37.3 %,86.4 %-87.0 % and 146.0 %-171.5 % higher plant dry matter yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency were also observed in these two specific treatments.However,60 % CRF application showed no promoting effect on the factors mentioned above.Difference of VC content between CRF and CCF treatments was no significant.Allicin content exhibited a negatively correlation with bulb yield.In order to ensure garlic flavor and quality,an extra S input should be applied together with CRF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRF at 100% and 80% increased bulb yield relative to CCF.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
100 % and 80 % CRF treatmentse0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %e0
Comparator
CCFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared to CCF,100 % and 80 % CRF treatments could increase bulb yield,bulb soluble sugar content and SOD activity significantly by 5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRF increased bulb soluble sugar content.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
100 % and 80 % CRF treatmentse0
Outcome
bulb soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.5 %-27.6 % and 15.1 %-30.0 %e0
Comparator
CCFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared to CCF,100 % and 80 % CRF treatments could increase bulb yield,bulb soluble sugar content and SOD activity significantly by 5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %,3.5 %-27.6 % and 15.1 %-30.0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRF increased SOD activity.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
CRFe1
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Value
48.1 %-93.2 % and 61.0 %-68.4 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“SOD activity significantly by 5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %,3.5 %-27.6 % and 15.1 %-30.0 %,48.1 %-93.2 % and 61.0 %-68.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to CCF,100 % and 80 % CRF treatments could increase bulb yield,bulb soluble sugar content and SOD activity significantly by 5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRF raised plant dry matter yield.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
CRFe1
Outcome
plant dry matter yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.5 %-20.5 % and 31.8 %-37.3 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“12.5 %-20.5 % and 31.8 %-37.3 %,86.4 %-87.0 % and 146.0 %-171.5 % higher plant dry matter yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency were also observed in these two specific treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–733 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to CCF,100 % and 80 % CRF treatments could increase bulb yield,bulb soluble sugar content and SOD activity significantly by 5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CRF raised nitrogen utilization efficiency.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
CRFe1
Outcome
nitrogen utilization efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
86.4 %-87.0 % and 146.0 %-171.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“86.4 %-87.0 % and 146.0 %-171.5 % higher plant dry matter yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency were also observed in these two specific treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–733 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to CCF,100 % and 80 % CRF treatments could increase bulb yield,bulb soluble sugar content and SOD activity significantly by 5.0 %-12.5 % and 15.0 %-15.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% CRF treatment did not promote the reported traits.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
60 % CRF applicatione0
Outcome
factors mentioned abovee0
Direction
no promoting effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“60 % CRF application showed no promoting effect on the factors mentioned above.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content did not significantly differ between CRF and CCF.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
CRFe0
Outcome
VC contente0
Comparator
CCFe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Difference of VC content between CRF and CCF treatments was no significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–895 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allicin content was negatively correlated with bulb yield.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Compound
Allicine0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Allicin content exhibited a negatively correlation with bulb yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–962 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend extra sulfur input with CRF to ensure flavor and quality.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Outcome
an extra S input should be applied together with CRFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garlic yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“In order to ensure garlic flavor and quality,an extra S input should be applied together with CRF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1060 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.