Paper · 2013 · Progress in Plant Protection

Infections of two types of maize hybrid cultivars depending on a form of nitrogen fertilizer

Piotr Szulc

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the disease infection of plants of two maize cultivar types depending on the applied form of nitrogen fertilizer. It was shown that the type of nitrogen fertilizer significantly affected maize plant infection with the pathogenic fungi of the genus Fusarium ssp. The use of slow‐release nitrogen fertilizers decreased the percentage of maize plants infected by the fusarium diseases in comparison to the treatment with fast‐release nitrogen fertilizers. The advantage of „stay‐green” type cultivar was shown as compared to the classic cultivar. After the application of slow‐release fertilizers, such as: ammonium sulphate and urea, was significantly greater (healthier plants) in terms of the number of plants infected with the fusarium diseases was significantly lower comparing to the treatments: without nitrogen fertilizer use, and after the use of ammonium nitrate, Canwil nitrochalk and a mixture of ammonium nitrate and urea (in a ratio of 50:50). The ES Paroli „stay‐green” hybrid was characterized by a significantly lower percentage of plants infected by the fusarium diseases and corn smut in comparison with the ES Palazzo cultivar. Celem pracy była ocena porażenia chorobami roślin dwóch typów odmian kukurydzy w zależności od formy nawozu azotowego. Wykazano, że rodzaj nawozu azotowego w istotny sposób wpływał na porażenie roślin kukurydzy grzybami z rodzaju Fusarium ssp. Stosowanie nawozów azotowych wolno działających zmniejszało odsetek roślin kukurydzy porażonych przez choroby fuzaryjne w porównaniu do nawozów azotowych szybko działających. Na nawozach wolno działających, takich jak: siarczan amonu i mocznik przewaga odmiany typu „stay‐green” nad odmianą klasyczną pod kątem ilości roślin porażonych przez choroby fuzaryjne była istotnie większa (rośliny zdrowsze) niż na obiektach: bez stosowania nawozu azotowego, saletrze amonowej, saletrzaku Canwil i mieszaninie saletry amonowej z mocznikiem z 50% udziałem każdego z nawozów w dawce nawozu. Mieszaniec ES Paroli typu „stay‐green” charakteryzował się istotnie mniejszym odsetkiem roślin porażonych przez choroby fuzaryjne oraz głownię kukurydzy w porównaniu do odmiany ES Palazzo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer type significantly affected maize infection with Fusarium fungi.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
type of nitrogen fertilizere0
Interactor
Fusarium ssp.e0pathogen
Outcome
maize plant infectione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was shown that the type of nitrogen fertilizer significantly affected maize plant infection with the pathogenic fungi of the genus Fusarium ssp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers reduced Fusarium disease infection compared with fast-release fertilizers.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
slow‐release nitrogen fertilizerse0
Interactor
fusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of maize plants infected by the fusarium diseasese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
fast‐release nitrogen fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of slow‐release nitrogen fertilizers decreased the percentage of maize plants infected by the fusarium diseases in comparison to the treatment with fast‐release nitrogen fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The stay-green cultivar had a greater health advantage after slow-release fertilizer than under the listed comparison treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
slow‐release fertilizerse0
Interactor
fusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
number of plants infected with the fusarium diseasese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
without nitrogen fertilizer usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the application of slow‐release fertilizers, such as: ammonium sulphate and urea, was significantly greater (healthier plants) in terms of the number of plants infected with the fusarium diseases was significantly lower comparing to the treatments: without nitrogen fertilizer use, and after the use of ammonium nitrate, Canwil nitrochalk and a mixture of ammonium nitrate and urea (in a ratio of 50:50).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrid cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ES Paroli had a significantly lower Fusarium infection percentage than ES Palazzo.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
ES Parolie0
Treatment
ES Paroli „stay‐green” hybride0
Interactor
fusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of plants infected by the fusarium diseasese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ES Palazzo cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ES Paroli „stay‐green” hybrid was characterized by a significantly lower percentage of plants infected by the fusarium diseases and corn smut in comparison with the ES Palazzo cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrid cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ES Paroli had a significantly lower corn smut infection percentage than ES Palazzo.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
ES Parolie0
Treatment
ES Paroli „stay‐green” hybride0
Outcome
corn smute0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ES Palazzo cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ES Paroli „stay‐green” hybrid was characterized by a significantly lower percentage of plants infected by the fusarium diseases and corn smut in comparison with the ES Palazzo cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrid cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Fusarium · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.