Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers reduced Fusarium disease infection compared with fast-release fertilizers.

A claim from Infections of two types of maize hybrid cultivars depending on a form of nitrogen fertilizer · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers reduced Fusarium disease infection compared with fast-release fertilizers.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
slow‐release nitrogen fertilizerse0
Interactor
fusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of maize plants infected by the fusarium diseasese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
fast‐release nitrogen fertilizerse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of slow‐release nitrogen fertilizers decreased the percentage of maize plants infected by the fusarium diseases in comparison to the treatment with fast‐release nitrogen fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–487

Title

Infections of two types of maize hybrid cultivars depending on a form of nitrogen fertilizer

Piotr Szulc Progress in Plant Protection 2013. doi:10.14199/ppp-2013-133

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2cd80fd859d76cc2a46756b016d5a732b8957e28b8c367e45db3e1d83abd2348 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · Fusarium · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.