Paper · 2000 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Dry-matter partitioning of late sown wheat under different irrigation schedules.

S. K. Pal; U. N. Verma; R. Thakur; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 1995-97 at Ranchi on sandy-loam soil in randomized block design to study the effect of irrigation on dry-matter partitioning and yield of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Treatment consisted of 11 irrigation schedules based on frequency and critical growth stages, viz 4 irrigations at (i) crown root initiation + maximum tillering + boot + milk; 3 irrigations at (ii) crown-root initiation + maximum tillering + boot; (iii) crown-root initiation + boot + milk; (iv) crown-root initiation + maximum tillering + milk; (v) maximum tillering + boot+ milk and 2 irrigations at (vi) crown-root initiation + maximum tillering; (vii) crown-root initiation + boot; (viii) crown-root initiation + milk; (ix) maximum tillering + boot; (x) maximum tillering + milk and (xi) boot + milk. Wheat with 4 irrigations gave 27.2 and 64.5 % more grain yield than the crop with 3 (2 128 kg/ha) and 2 (1 646 kg/ha) irrigations respectively. Water-stress at maximum tillering and milk stages drastically reduced the grain yield by 34.7 and 25.9 % respectively compared with the crop with 4 irrigations (2707 kg/ha). Similarly crop with4 irrigations accumulated 60.2 % of total dry-matter (1 089 g/m 2 )in spike, 34.9% in stem and only 5% in the leaves at maturity. Moisture stress at maximum tillering caused maximum reduction in total dry-matter production (23.8 %) as well as spike dry-matter partitioning by approximately 4%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations increased grain yield 27.2 percent relative to three irrigations.

Treatment
4 irrigationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
27.2e0
Qualifier
2 128 kg/hae0
Comparator
3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat with 4 irrigations gave 27.2 and 64.5 % more grain yield than the crop with 3 (2 128 kg/ha) and 2 (1 646 kg/ha) irrigations respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations increased grain yield 64.5 percent relative to two irrigations.

Treatment
4 irrigationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
64.5 %e0
Qualifier
1 646 kg/hae0
Comparator
2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat with 4 irrigations gave 27.2 and 64.5 % more grain yield than the crop with 3 (2 128 kg/ha) and 2 (1 646 kg/ha) irrigations respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at maximum tillering reduced grain yield by 34.7 percent relative to four irrigations.

Treatment
Water-stress at maximum tilleringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34.7e0
Qualifier
2707 kg/hae0
Comparator
crop with 4 irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-stress at maximum tillering and milk stages drastically reduced the grain yield by 34.7 and 25.9 % respectively compared with the crop with 4 irrigations (2707 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at milk stage reduced grain yield by 25.9 percent relative to four irrigations.

Treatment
milk stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25.9 %e0
Qualifier
2707 kg/hae0
Comparator
crop with 4 irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-stress at maximum tillering and milk stages drastically reduced the grain yield by 34.7 and 25.9 % respectively compared with the crop with 4 irrigations (2707 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With four irrigations, 60.2 percent of total dry matter accumulated in spikes at maturity.

Organ / stage
spikee0
Treatment
4 irrigationse0
Outcome
total dry-mattere0
Value
60.2 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop with4 irrigations accumulated 60.2 % of total dry-matter (1 089 g/m 2 )in spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With four irrigations, 34.9 percent of total dry matter accumulated in stems at maturity.

Outcome
steme0
Value
34.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“34.9% in stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With four irrigations, 5 percent of total dry matter accumulated in leaves at maturity.

Outcome
leavese0
Value
5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 5% in the leaves at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress at maximum tillering reduced total dry matter production by 23.8 percent.

Treatment
Moisture stress at maximum tilleringe0
Outcome
total dry-matter productione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
23.8 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture stress at maximum tillering caused maximum reduction in total dry-matter production (23.8 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress at maximum tillering reduced spike dry matter partitioning by approximately 4 percent.

Treatment
Moisture stress at maximum tilleringe0
Outcome
spike dry-matter partitioninge0
Direction
reductione0
Value
4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture stress at maximum tillering caused maximum reduction in total dry-matter production (23.8 %) as well as spike dry-matter partitioning by approximately 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.