Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Biochemical basis of resistance in wheat on inoculation with cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae.

Deepika Rohatgi; Pankaj; Shailendra Singh Gaurav; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biochemical basis of nematode disease resistance was studied by analysis of the activity of three enzymes, peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) in the shoot and root tissues of resistant and susceptible genotypes of wheat before and after inoculation with the cereal cyst nematode H. avenae. The biochemical studies were conducted with the parent cultivars/lines, the F1 population, F2, BC1 and test cross populations of the cross Raj 1482 × CCNRV1 (Raj MR1) An elevated level of enzyme activity was observed in all the inoculated plants both in the susceptible and resistant cultivars, though, the resistant cultivars have shown maximum enzyme activity in comparison to the susceptible cultivars. The root tissues had shown increased enzyme activity in comparison to the shoot tissues, irrespective of nematode inoculation. Among the three biochemical enzymes studied, PAL had shown the maximum enzyme activity, in both the shoots and roots irrespective of susceptible and resistant cultivars. Analysis of enzyme activity in the cross between Raj1482 × Raj MR1, depicted that F1 generation had shown tremendous increase in the enzyme activity in all the three enzymes studied, over either of the parents. The F2 population showed lower enzyme activity in comparison to F1 population. The results with BC1 (test cross) and BC1 population were almost at par. In comparison to phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and peroxidase (PO), Polyphenol-oxidase (PPO) did not reveal a significant difference in the control and inoculated plants irrespective of susceptible and resistant cultivar taken into consideration or the type of tissue (shoot/root) analysed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation elevated enzyme activity in susceptible and resistant wheat.

Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Direction
elevatede0
Comparator
susceptible and resistant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An elevated level of enzyme activity was observed in all the inoculated plants both in the susceptible and resistant cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant wheat cultivars had maximum enzyme activity relative to susceptible cultivars.

Material
resistant cultivarse0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
susceptible cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the resistant cultivars have shown maximum enzyme activity in comparison to the susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tissues had increased enzyme activity relative to shoot tissues regardless of inoculation.

Organ / stage
root tissuese0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
irrespective of nematode inoculatione0
Comparator
shoot tissuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root tissues had shown increased enzyme activity in comparison to the shoot tissues, irrespective of nematode inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL showed maximum enzyme activity among the three enzymes in shoots and roots.

Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Gene
PALe0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the three biochemical enzymes studied, PAL had shown the maximum enzyme activity, in both the shoots and roots irrespective of susceptible and resistant cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F1 generation had increased activity of all three studied enzymes over either parent.

Material
F1 generatione0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Direction
tremendous increasee0
Comparator
either of the parentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F1 generation had shown tremendous increase in the enzyme activity in all the three enzymes studied, over either of the parents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 population had lower enzyme activity than the F1 population.

Material
F2 populatione0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
F1 populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The F2 population showed lower enzyme activity in comparison to F1 population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 test cross and BC1 populations had nearly equal enzyme activity.

Material
BC1 (test cross)e0
Outcome
resultse0
Direction
almost at pare0
Comparator
BC1 populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results with BC1 (test cross) and BC1 population were almost at par.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PPO activity did not differ significantly between control and inoculated wheat plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Gene
Polyphenol-oxidase (PPO)e0
Outcome
Polyphenol-oxidase (PPO)e0
Direction
did not reveal a significant differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyphenol-oxidase (PPO) did not reveal a significant difference in the control and inoculated plants irrespective of susceptible and resistant cultivar taken into consideration or the type of tissue (shoot/root) analysed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.