application · Nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)
25 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 14
51.膵腫瘍患者のCT像より求めた腫瘍体積による放射線治療効果の判定方法(第41回総会会員研究発表)(X-CT-3 撮影技術 測定・演算) · 1985
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of Different Concentrations of Arctium lappa L. Extract on Spinach's Growth and Quality · 2010
- positive
Effects of seaweed foliar fertilizers on yield and quality of spinach and pakchoi · 2011
- positive
IMPROVING THE GROWTH, PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SPINACH PLANTS (Spinacia oleracea L.) · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Evaluation of liquid organic manures as biostimulants on the agronomic performance of spinach · 2024
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.