salicylic acid · Growth · Vitis
16 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 4
4 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- [Allelopathy of grape root aqueous extracts]. (2010)
decreaseApplied salicylic acid inhibited grape seedling growth in pot experiments.
THE EFFECT OF SALICYLIC ACID TREATMENT ON GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS DEVELOPMENT (2022)increaseSalicylic acid stimulated shoot growth and leaf surface in all tested grape varieties.
What separates themTest system: controlled environment · fieldCompare the two papers → - [Allelopathy of grape root aqueous extracts]. (2010)
decreaseApplied salicylic acid inhibited grape seedling growth in pot experiments.
USE OF SALICYLIC ACID IN THE PRODUCTION OF GRAFTED GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS (2021)increaseSalicylic acid stimulated budding of the scion, shoot growth and root system development
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - [Allelopathy of grape root aqueous extracts]. (2010)
decreaseApplied salicylic acid inhibited grape seedling growth in pot experiments.
The effect of salicylic acid on qualitative and quantitative characteristics of grafted grapevine seedlings (2021)increaseSalicylic acid stimulated scion budding, shoot growth and root system development.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - The effect of salicylic acid on qualitative and quantitative characteristics of grafted grapevine seedlings (2021)
decreaseHigh salicylic acid concentration inhibited shoot growth.
THE EFFECT OF SALICYLIC ACID TREATMENT ON GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS DEVELOPMENT (2022)increaseSalicylic acid stimulated shoot growth and leaf surface in all tested grape varieties.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 8
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
USE OF SALICYLIC ACID IN THE PRODUCTION OF GRAFTED GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS · 2021
- positive
- positive
- negative
THE EFFECT OF SALICYLIC ACID TREATMENT ON GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS DEVELOPMENT · 2022
- positive
- positive
INCREASE IN THE YIELD OF PLANTING MATERIAL WHEN USING THE METHOD OF LIGNIFIED CUTTINGS OF GRAPES · 2023
- positive
EFFECT OF SALICYLIC ACID AND POTASSIUM SULPHATE ON GROWTH AND YIELD GRAPES CV. 2A CLONE · 2024
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
Effects of Calcium Cyanamide and Salicylic Acid on Dormancy-release of Grape Bud · 2007
- no effect
- no effect
[Allelopathy of grape root aqueous extracts]. · 2010
- negative
In vitro tissue culture as a tool for Croatian grapevine germplasm management · 2024
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.