Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Kumshatsky white root response was weakest, with 1.6 pcs. maximum excess over control at 0.5 mg/l.

A claim from THE EFFECT OF SALICYLIC ACID TREATMENT ON GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS DEVELOPMENT · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kumshatsky white root response was weakest, with 1.6 pcs. maximum excess over control at 0.5 mg/l.

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Material
Kumshatsky whitee0
Treatment
salicylic acid 0.5 mg/le0
Outcome
formation of the root systeme0
Direction
excesse0
Value
1.6 pcs.e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61
e0

“The effect of salicylic acid treatment on the formation of the root system of seedlings of Kumshatsky white variety was the least pronounced, the largest excess over the control was 1.6 pcs. in the salicylic acid 0.5 mg/l variant, no significant differences with the standard were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1864

Title

THE EFFECT OF SALICYLIC ACID TREATMENT ON GRAPEVINE SEEDLINGS DEVELOPMENT

Natalya Pavlyuchenko; Svetlana Melnikova; Olga Kolesnikova; et al. Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university 2022. doi:10.12737/2073-0462-2022-25-31

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-b6e330a8a91e152d6d028d0c1f3cececd42a82deb0065401eb40a6662c84428b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

salicylic acid · growth · VitisResults differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.