dimethyl disulfide · Phenology · Vitis
6 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Identification of Active Substances in Chinese Chive and Rakkyo Plants Responsible for Breaking Bud Dormancy in Grape Cuttings (2003)
increaseA 24-hr exposure to 99% dimethyl disulfide greatly promoted budbreak in late November, whereas 12-hr exposure had a slight effect.
ACTIVE SUBSATNCES IN CHINESE CHIVE AND RAKKYO PLANTS FOR BREAKING BUD DORMANCY IN GRAPEVINES (1992)decreaseA 75% dimethyl disulfide solution inhibited budbreak of grapevine cuttings after 24 hr of exposure.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 2
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.