Claim · model-written summary
No budbreak was observed in cuttings exposed to 30% dimethyl disulfide for 12 or 24 hr.
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“responsible for breaking bud dormancy in grapevines”
e7“no budbreak was observed in cuttings exposed to 30% dimethyl disulfide for 12 or 24 hr”
Title
Naohiro Kubota; Koji Toriu; Yasushi Yamane; et al. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 2003. doi:10.2503/jjshs.72.268
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Chinese chive volatiles contained methyl mercaptan and allyl mercaptan.
- Observation Rakkyo volatiles contained dimethyl disulfide.
- Intervention effect Methyl mercaptan promoted budbreak of grapevine cuttings in late December and mid January.
- Intervention effect A lower concentration of methyl mercaptan gave a uniform rate of budbreak in grapevine cuttings.
- Intervention effect Allyl mercaptan was effective in promoting budbreak of grapevine cuttings in late December.
- Intervention effect Allyl mercaptan inhibited budbreak of grapevine cuttings in mid January.
- Observation The effect of dimethyl disulfide on grapevine budbreak seemed to vary with concentration, time and duration of exposure.
- Intervention effect A 24-hr exposure to 99% dimethyl disulfide greatly promoted budbreak in late November, whereas 12-hr exposure had a slight effect.
- Intervention effect A 24-hr exposure to a 10% dimethyl disulfide suspension promoted budbreak in late December.
- Intervention effect A 24-hr exposure to a 75% dimethyl disulfide suspension inhibited budbreak in late December.