stage · Yield · Vitis
19 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 8
Organic Acids and Sugars in Musts of Irrigated Grapevines in Northeast Portugal · 2009
- positive
- positive
- positive
Nitrogen Management in Grapes as a Function of Rate and Time of Application · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
An efficient irrigation method for facility-cultivated grape trees at various stages of development · 2024
- positive
- positive
Increasing grapevine canopy height to compensate for pre-flowering basal leaf removal · 2025
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4
- negative
Effects of site, season and viticultural practices on grape seed development · 1996
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
Response of Colombar Grapevines to Irrigation as Regards Quality Aspects and Growth · 2017
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.