pruning · Quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)
14 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 0 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 5
- positive
- no effect
Impact of Damage Control and Quality of Output: Estimating Pest Control Effectiveness · 1992
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of paclobutrazol and summer pruning on yield and fruit quality of apple cv. ‘Red delicious’ · 2015
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 7
Effect of Time of Nitrogen Application on Amino‐Nitrogen Composition of Roots and Xylem Sap of Apple · 1976
- no effect
Influence of Pruning and Urea Sprays on Growth and Fruiting of Spur-bound ‘Delicious’ Apple Trees · 1988
- no effect
Effect of Root System Pruning on Root Activity and Canopy Characteristics of Apple Tree · 2013
- negative
THE INFLUENCE OF APPLE TREE CHEMICAL THINNING ON YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY · 2013
- no effect
Does Thinning of Old Apple Trees Improve Fruit Quality and Decrease Pest Incidence? · 2014
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.