Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Fruit Science

Does Thinning of Old Apple Trees Improve Fruit Quality and Decrease Pest Incidence?

Ele Vool; Reelika Rätsep; Kadri Karp; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of thinning on fruit weight, color, biochemical composition, and on leaf insect occurrence was studied in an over 80-year-old orchard on two apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) old cultivars: Liivi Sibulõun and Paide Taliõun. The study was conducted to restore an old orchard for quality apple juice production. Pruning led to a significant increase in pests, but the number of natural enemies of pests and of neutral insects did not increase. The total number of arthropods was significantly higher on ‘Paide Taliõun’ in the second year after pruning. Consequently, more pests were found in both experimental years on this cultivar. Pruning significantly increased leaf SPAD value leading to a decrease in the total phenolics content of the fruit. The effect of thinning on ascorbic acid content was cultivar dependent. Fruit skin was greener, apple flesh color was yellower, and fruit weight increased by up to 60% after pruning. Among apple taste parameters, the sugar acidity ratio was not influenced by pruning but was positively correlated with skin color, especially in ‘Liivi Sibulõun’. Thinning of old apple trees does not affect the taste of apples but could reduce the impact on the healthy parameters, such as phenolic compounds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning significantly increased pests on apple trees.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Pruninge0
Outcome
pestse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning led to a significant increase in pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–369 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning did not increase natural enemies of pests or neutral insects.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Pruninge1
Outcome
number of natural enemies of pests and of neutral insectse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of natural enemies of pests and of neutral insects did not increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–453 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pruning led to a significant increase in pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–369 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total arthropod numbers were significantly higher on Paide Taliõun in the second year after pruning.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Material
Paide Taliõune0
Outcome
total number of arthropodse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second year after pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total number of arthropods was significantly higher on ‘Paide Taliõun’ in the second year after pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More pests were found on Paide Taliõun in both experimental years.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Material
Paide Taliõune1
Outcome
pestse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
both experimental yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more pests were found in both experimental years on this cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–643 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Paide Taliõun’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning significantly increased apple leaf SPAD value.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
Pruninge0
Outcome
SPAD valuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning significantly increased leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning decreased total phenolics content of apple fruit.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
Pruninge1
Outcome
total phenolics content of the fruite0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to a decrease in the total phenolics content of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–758 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pruning significantly increased leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of thinning on apple ascorbic acid content depended on cultivar.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Qualifier
cultivar dependente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of thinning on ascorbic acid content was cultivar dependent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit skin was greener after pruning.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
Fruit skine0
Direction
greenere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit skin was greener, apple flesh color was yellower, and fruit weight increased by up to 60% after pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple flesh color was yellower after pruning.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
pruninge1
Outcome
apple flesh colore0
Direction
yellowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple flesh color was yellower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“after pruning. Among apple taste parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased apple fruit weight by up to 60%.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight increased by up to 60% after pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning did not influence the sugar acidity ratio.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
sugar acidity ratioe0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sugar acidity ratio was not influenced by pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar acidity ratio was positively correlated with skin color, especially in Liivi Sibulõun.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Material
Liivi Sibulõune0
Organ / stage
skine0
Outcome
sugar acidity ratioe1
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was positively correlated with skin color, especially in ‘Liivi Sibulõun’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“the sugar acidity ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that thinning old apple trees does not affect apple taste.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Thinninge0
Outcome
taste of applese0
Direction
does not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning of old apple trees does not affect the taste of apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1169 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

47 papers: 21 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

pruning · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.