Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Thinning did not influence fruit chemical composition in tested cultivars.

A claim from THE INFLUENCE OF APPLE TREE CHEMICAL THINNING ON YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning did not influence fruit chemical composition in tested cultivars.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
thinning treatmentse0
Outcome
Chemical fruit compositione0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical fruit composition was not influenced by thinning treatments in all tested cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–977
t0

“APPLE TREE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–27

Title

THE INFLUENCE OF APPLE TREE CHEMICAL THINNING ON YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY

D. Radivojević; J. Milivojević; C. Oparnica; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2013. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2013.981.51

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-bc784fa8b75cd8eacbb3f887d6ed256f27708a751ca4dc3beaa0a4e68ea61b9b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.